RESUMEN
Background Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as an alternative approach for mitigating thrombotic risk in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. However, existing registries often lack representation of the Hispanic population, motivating this study to elucidate the demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics, specifically among Hispanic patients undergoing this procedure. Methods Adult patients who underwent percutaneous LAAC between June 2017 and July 2022 at a high-complexity hospital in Bogotá, COL, were included. Baseline and procedural characteristics are reported. For patients with available follow-up data, major bleeding, thromboembolic events, and cardiovascular mortality were assessed. A subgroup analysis was conducted for patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Results We included 33 patients. Follow-up data were available for 27 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 12.4 months. The median age of the cohort was 70 years (SD 9), with 58% being women. The median CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scores were 3 points (IQR 2 to 4) and 4 points (IQR 3 to 4), respectively. The 90-day cardiovascular mortality rate was 3.7%, whereas cardioembolic episodes and major bleeding events were reported at rates of 10.8 and 14.4 per 100 patient years, respectively. The long-term outcomes of patients on dialysis were comparable to those of nondialysis patients. Conclusions Our study reinforces existing evidence supporting the safety of LAAC, particularly in a multimorbid patient population with elevated bleeding and thrombotic risks. In this high-risk cohort, LAAC emerges as a feasible alternative for reducing thromboembolic risk. Notably, patients on dialysis demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes, suggesting the procedure's viability in this subgroup as well.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to reduce thrombotic risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. This procedure conventionally requires the use of a contrast agent. A significant proportion of patients who undergo this procedure have chronic kidney disease, with a high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically review existing literature regarding the feasibility and safety of a zero-contrast LAAC technique. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies comparing a zero-contrast LAAC technique with conventional LAAC up to April 2024. From each study, we extracted baseline characteristics, feasibility, and safety outcomes. A random model meta-analysis was used to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Five studies reporting data from 367 patients were included. A 100% successful implantation rate was reported in all the zero-contrast groups. The mean number of recaptures reached no significant difference between the groups (mean difference, -0.15; CI, -0.67 to 0.37; I2 = 0%; P = .58). The zero-contrast group had a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (mean difference, -4.03; CI, -7.72 to -0.34; I2 = 67%; P = .03). Complications related to the procedure, peridevice leak, and device-associated thrombus rates were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Zero-contrast LAAC is a feasible alternative. The success and complication rates are consistent with those of conventional LAAC. Aside from the inherent benefit of zero-contrast exposure, this technique allows a reduction in fluoroscopy time.
RESUMEN
Coronary chronic total occlusions are challenging lesions with high rates of complications related to percutaneous intervention. We describe a successful angioplasty in a patient with a recent coronary perforation, using multiple techniques, such as stick and swap with Stingray, subintimal transcatheter withdrawal, and investment.