RESUMEN
We present the case of a patient with a history of symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes and a negative 72-hour fasting test with histological confirmation of insulinoma. A literature review of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia with a negative fasting test was performed. LEARNING POINTS: The 72-hour fasting test is the gold standard for insulinoma diagnosis.Few cases of insulinoma with a negative fasting test have been reported.New strategies for insulinoma diagnosis are being investigated.
RESUMEN
RESUMEN El coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave es el tercer betacoronavirus desde el año 2003 capaz de ocasionar una infección del tracto respiratorio inferior, llevando, en casos críticos, al síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda y la muerte. La edad avanzada, la hipertensión arterial y la diabetes mellitus son, entre otros, tres factores determinantes en los peores desenlaces clínicos. Múltiples mecanismos pueden explicar la mayor susceptibilidad de las personas diabéticas a las infecciones respiratorias. La hiperglucemia crónica altera tanto a la inmunidad humoral como al celular. Esta enfermedad predispone a la sobreexpresión de la proteína de la membrana celular que sirve como receptora del virus y a una respuesta inflamatoria exacerbada, aumentando el riesgo de una descompensación y de la aparición de crisis hiperglicémicas. Ante la ausencia de un tratamiento efectivo o de una vacuna, todos los esfuerzos deben hacerse para procurar un buen control metabólico de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus con y sin COVID-19. Por lo anterior, se plantean en este artículo de reflexión, diferentes propuestas para el tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus en la unidad de cuidados intensivos, sin descartar la forma ambulatoria, en donde la telemedicina y otras tecnologías permitirán acortar la distancia y mantener las medidas de aislamiento preventivo.
SUMMARY Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is the third beta-coronavirus since 2003 capable of causing lower respiratory tract infection, leading to severe cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome and death. Advanced age, high blood pressure and diabetes mellitus are three predictors of worse clinical outcomes. Multiple mechanisms could explain the greater susceptibility of diabetic people to respiratory infections. Chronic hyperglycemia alters both humoral and cellular immunity. This disease predisposes to virus receptor overexpression and an exaggerated inflammatory response, increasing the risk of decompensation and hyperglycemic crises. In the absence of an effective vaccine or treatment for the virus, this vicious circle should be stopped with an emphasis on controlling glucose. This paper presents different proposals for the treatment of diabetes mellitus both on an outpatient basis where telemedicine and other technologies will make it possible to continue adequate ambulatory care to maintain preventive isolation measures up to care in the intensive care unit.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Pandemias , Control Glucémico , GlucosaRESUMEN
Introducción: Existen diferentes opciones de manejo para pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DMT2) que ya iniciaron tratamiento farmacológico con metformina y no han alcanzado metas de control glucémico. Resulta prioritario definir pautas para escoger la mejor opción en estos pacientes, así como en aquellos que no han tenido un control óptimo con la combinación de dos medicamentos. Objetivo: Definir cuál es antidiabético de elección, entre sulfonilureas, tiazolidinedionas, inhibidores de DPP-4, agonista del receptor de GLP-1 o insulina basal, como segunda y tercera líneas de manejo en pacientes con DMT2. Métodos: Se elaboró la guía de práctica clínica, siguiendo los lineamientos de la guía metodológica del Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social colombiano. Se revisó la evidencia disponible de forma sistemática y se formularon las recomendaciones utilizando la metodología GRADE. Conclusiones: En pacientes con DMT2 y falla terapéutica al manejo con metformina como monoterapia (HbA1C > 7 %) se recomienda como primera opción adicionar un inhibidor DPP-4, como segunda opción adicionar inhibidor SGLT2 o sulfonilureas con bajo riesgo de hipoglucemia y como tercera opción agregar insulina basal a los pacientes que con la combinación de dos fármacos fallen en alcanzar su meta de HbA1C. Si la falla terapéutica se asocia con un IMC persistentemente ≥ 30, se sugiere la adición de un agonista de GLP-1 por el potencial beneficio sobre la reducción de peso.
Introduction: There are different options to treat type 2 diabetes (DMT2) patients who began treatment with metformin and have not reached therapeutic golds. It is imperative to define rules to choose the best option, in these patients, as in those who have not achieved an optimal control under combined therapy. Aim: To define the best option between sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, DPP4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonist or basal insulin, as second or third line treatment, in patients with DMT2 who have not reached therapeutic golds with metformin or combined therapy. Methods: A clinical practice guide has been developed following the broad outline of the methodological guide from the Colombian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, with the aim of systematically gathering scientific evidence and formulating recommendations using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Conclusions: In patients with DMT2 who did not reach their therapeutic goal with metformin as a monotherapy (Hb1Ac <7%), addition of a second oral antidiabetic medication is recommended. it is recommended as a first step to add a DPP-4 inhibitor. It is suggested to add a SGLT2 inhibitor or a sulfonylurea having low risk of hypoglycemia as acceptable options. It is suggested to add basal insulin as a third antidiabetic medication if the combination of two pharmacological treatments does not enable the patient to reach and maintain the HbA1c goal. It is suggested to add a GLP-1 agonist if therapeutic failure appears in patients who remain obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²), considering its potential to reduce weight.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , MetforminaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is a frequent phenomenon in hospitalized patients that is associated with negative outcomes. It is common in liver transplant patients as a result of stress and is related to immunosuppressant drugs. Although studies are few, a history of diabetes and the presentation of hyperglycemia during liver transplantation have been associated with a higher risk for rejection. AIMS: To analyze whether hyperglycemia during the first 48hours after liver transplantation was associated with a higher risk for infection, rejection, or longer hospital stay. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients above the age of 15years that received a liver transplant. Hyperglycemia was defined as a value above 140mg/dl and it was measured in three different manners (as an isolated value, as a mean value, and as a weighted value over time). The relation of hyperglycemia to a risk for acute rejection, infection, or longer hospital stay was evaluated. RESULTS: Some form of hyperglycemia was present in 94% of the patients during the first 48 post-transplantation hours, regardless of its definition. There was no increased risk for rejection (OR: 1.49; 95%CI: 0.55-4.05), infection (OR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.16-2.25), or longer hospital stay between the patients that presented with hyperglycemia and those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperglycemia during the first 48hours after transplantation appeared to be an expected phenomenon in the majority of patients and was not associated with a greater risk for rejection or infection and it had no impact on the duration of hospital stay.
Asunto(s)
Hiperglucemia/complicaciones , Trasplante de Hígado , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
La hipertrigliceridemia (HTG) es una causa potencial de pancreatitis aguda (PA), especialmente cuando su valor es mayor de 1.000 mg/dL. Se han propuesto diferentes medidas para el tratamiento de pacientes con PA secundaria a HTG, entre ellas la que parece ser más efectiva: la plasmaféresis. Se reporta el caso de un paciente con HTG grave (triglicéridos de 6.480 mg/dL) que presentó una PA y cuya evolución fue favorable con la plasmaféresis.
Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is a potential cause of acute pancreatitis (AP), especially when its value is higher than 1.000 mg/dL. Different therapeutic measures have been proposed for patients with AP secondary to HTG, including the one that seems to be more effective: plasmapheresis. We report the case of a patient with severe HTG (triglycerides 6.480 mg/dL) that suffered from AP, and had favorable evolution with plasmapheresis.