RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to clarify the validity of laparoscopic surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforation by comparing the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic and open emergency surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the data of patients who underwent surgery for lower gastrointestinal perforation. Patients were categorized into two groups: the laparoscopic group who underwent laparoscopic surgery, and the open group who underwent laparotomy. Clinical and operative outcomes between the two groups were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients were included in the study. There were 66 and 153 patients with small bowel and colorectal perforations, respectively. The median operative time in the laparoscopic group was shorter than that in the open group (126 min vs. 146 min, p = .049). The mean amount of intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (50.4 mL vs. 400.1 mL, p < .001). The incidence of postoperative complication was higher in the open group (20.0% vs. 66.5%, p < .001), especially wound infection (0% vs. 26.3%, p = .002). Median hospital stays were 14 days and 24 days in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively (p < .001). In the laparoscopic group, hospital mortality was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach for small bowel and colorectal perforation in an emergency setting is a safe procedure in carefully selected patients and may contribute to decreased intraoperative blood loss, shortened hospital stay, and decreased incidence of postoperative complications, especially wound infection.
Asunto(s)
Perforación Intestinal , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Tempo Operativo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Intestino Delgado/cirugía , Intestino Delgado/lesiones , LaparotomíaRESUMEN
Bacillus cereus is an opportunistic pathogen that often causes severe infections such as bacteremia, with sphingomyelinase (SMase) being a crucial virulence factor. Although many strains of B. cereus carry the SMase gene, they are classified as SMase-producing and nonproducing strains. The reason for different SMase production among B. cereus strains remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the relationship between SMase and the PlcR transcriptional regulation system to clarify the mechanism leading to varied SMase production among B. cereus strains. We analyzed the sequence of the PlcR box, which is a transcriptional regulator-binding site, located at the promoter region of SMase and phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C. Based on differences in the PlcR box sequences, we classified the B. cereus strains into three groups (I, II, and III). SMase expression and activity were hardly detected in Group III strains. In Group I strains, SMase activity and its expression were maximal at the onset of the stationary phase and decreased during the stationary phase, whereas those were maintained during the stationary phase in Group II stains. On injection of B. cereus strains into mice or incubation with macrophages for phagocytosis assay, the SMase-producing Group I and II strains showed higher pathogenicity than Group III strains. These findings suggest that PlcR box sequence in B. cereus affects the production of SMase, which may provide important clinical information for the detection of highly pathogenic B. cereus strains.