RESUMEN
Background: Age is a strong prognostic factor in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), with children doing better than adults with the same disease. One hypothesis for this age-based disparity is differences in treatment regimens. Optimizing care for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with ALL has not been well defined and disparities in care exist. We conducted a retrospective study of all veterans with ALL diagnosed between the ages of 18 and 45 since the year 2000 to evaluate disparities among prognostication methods, treatment regimens, and accrual to clinical trials with regard to age and race/ethnicity and how these factors influence overall survival. Methods: Electronic medical record data from the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) were used to identify 6,724 patients with an ICD-9 or 10 code for ALL. All patients were chart checked to confirm an ALL diagnosis between the ages of 18 and 45 and excluded if they were diagnosed before 2000, had childhood ALL, or if induction protocol was not recorded. A total of 252 patients were included in the final analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed with controls for age, ALL subtype (B, T, mixed phenotype), Ph status, cytogenetic risk (based on modified Medical Research Council-Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (MRC-ECOG) study), obesity (body mass index (BMI) > 30), and race. Results: Patients treated with pediatric regimens, including pediatric-inspired regimens, have statistically significant (P = 0.009) survival gains, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.52 after controlling for age, obesity, ALL subtype, cytogenetic risk and race. White patients had significantly improved OS compared to people of color (HR 0.57, P = 0.02) after controlling for the aforementioned covariates. Black patients were far less likely (23%) to receive a transplant than non-Black patients (46%). Only 7% of patients were treated on a clinical trial. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that treatment with a pediatric regimen significantly improves overall survival in patients up to the age of 45 and suggests ongoing shortcomings in treatment for young adults with ALL, especially 30 to 45 years old, including persistently high use of adult induction regimens, low rates of referral to clinical trials, and significant racial disparities in bone marrow transplants for Black patients.
RESUMEN
The Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act expanded U.S. Veterans' health care and benefits for conditions linked to service-connected exposures (e.g., Burn Pits, Agent Orange). However, myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are not recognized as presumptive conditions for Veterans exposed to these toxic substances. This study evaluated the development of MPN among U.S. Veterans from the Korean, Vietnam, and Persian Gulf War eras. This retrospective cohort study included 65 425 Korean War era Veterans; 211 927 Vietnam War era Veterans; and 214 007 Persian Gulf War era Veterans from January 1, 2006, to January 26, 2023. Veterans with MPN, thrombosis, bleeding, and cardiovascular risk factors were identified through ICD-9 and -10 codes. Veterans from the Persian Gulf War era had the highest risk of developing MPN compared with Veterans from the Korean and Vietnam War eras, hazard ratio (HR) 4.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.20-5.75 and HR 2.49, 95% CI 2.20-2.82, both p < .0001, respectively. Vietnam War era Veterans also had a higher risk of MPN development compared with Korean War era Veterans, HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.77-2.21, p < .0001. Persian Gulf War era Veterans were diagnosed with MPN at an earlier age, had higher risks of thrombosis and bleeding, and had lower survival rates compared with Korean War and Vietnam War era Veterans. This study reinforces evidence that environmental and occupational hazards increase the risk of clonal myeloid disorders and related complications, impacting overall survival with MPN. Limitations include the inability to confirm clonality and fully verify deployment and exposure status.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Abnormalities in HER2 are well-established oncogenic drivers and are approved therapeutic targets in various malignancies. Prior studies evaluating HER2 expression in prostate cancer (PCa) have yielded variable results. Most of these studies used immunohistochemistry scoring systems based on breast cancer data. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical significance of HER2 expression using a scoring system that better reflects the HER2 staining pattern observed in PCa. METHODS: We randomly selected similar numbers of localized low risk (AJCC stage I), locally advanced (AJCC stages II & III), and metastatic (AJCC stage IV) PCa patients treated at the DC VA Medical Center between 2000 and 2022. Among them, we included patients who had sufficient PCa tissue samples and clinical information required for this analysis. Two experienced pathologists independently scored HER2 expression (Ventana Pathway anti-HER2) according to a modified gastric cancer HER2 scoring system. RESULTS: Out of the 231 patients included, 85 % self-identified as Black. 58.9 % of patients expressed HER2 (1+: 35.5 %; 2+: 18.2 %; 3+: 5.2 %). Validity of the results was confirmed using the HercepTest antibody. Higher HER2 expression was associated with a higher Gleason Score/Grade Group and advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the adverse prognostic impact on HER2 in PCa. We propose the use of a modified scoring system to evaluate HER2 expression in PCa. The observed high prevalence of HER2 expression supports the consideration of novel HER2-targeted therapies addressing even low levels of HER2 expression in future PCa trials.