Asunto(s)
Unidades Hospitalarias/organización & administración , Hospitales de Enseñanza/historia , Hospitales Universitarios/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , North Carolina , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto/economía , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Política de Salud , Industrias , Anciano , Congresos como Asunto , Economía Hospitalaria/tendencias , Gobierno , Educación en Salud , Sistemas Prepagos de Salud , Hospitales de Enseñanza/tendencias , Humanos , Renta , Indigencia Médica , Dinámica Poblacional , Derivación y Consulta , Facultades de Medicina , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Recursos en Salud/provisión & distribución , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Control de Costos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Financiación Gubernamental , Financiación Personal , Gastos en Salud , Seguro de Salud , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Política , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The public, the federal government and most state governments have become increasingly concerned with the lack of access to primary care as well as the specialty and geographic maldistribution problems. Currently, there is a race in progress between the private sector and the federal government to devise solutions to these problems. In the federal sector, varying pieces of legislation are under active consideration to mandate the correction of specialty and geographic maldistribution; proposals include: 1) setting up federal machinery to regulate the numbers and types of residencies; 2) make obligatory the creation of Departments of Family Practice in each medical school; 3) withdraw current education support from medical schools causing tuition levels to increase substantially--federal student loans would then provide the necessary leverage to obligate the borrower to two years of service in an under-served area in exchange for loan forgiveness. In the private sector, for the first time in the history of the United States, the five major organizations involved in medical care have organized to form the Coordinating Council on Medical Education (CCME) and the Liaison Committee on Graduate Medical Education (LCGME). One of the initial major endeavors of the CCME has been to address itself to the problem of specialty maldistribution. The LCGME has been tooling up to become the accrediting group for residency training thus providing an overview of the quality and quantity of specialty training. It will be the intent of this presentation to bring the membership of the Southern Surgical Association an up-to-date report on these parallel efforts. The author's personal hope is that the private sector can move sufficiently rapidly to set up its own regulatory mechanisms and avert another federally controlled bureaucracy that will forever change the character of the medical profession in the United States.