RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Treatment with antidepressants and antipsychotics, though effective, is unspecific as agents that differ greatly in their biochemical and pharmacological actions have virtually the same efficacy. Half of the patients with initial improvement show incomplete response, while a large proportion of patients exhibit a refractory clinical picture which is resistant to all treatment modalities. METHODS: Our analyses were based on a reference study of 2,848 depressive inpatients under monotherapeutic treatment with 7 different antidepressants or placebo, along with a naturalistic study of depressive and schizophrenic patients (296 inpatients, 363 outpatients) under today's "standard" polypharmaceutic treatment regimens. RESULTS: The empirical data suggested the following predictors of response: (1) severity at baseline, (2) early onset of improvement, (3) unwanted side-effects, and (4) medical comorbidity. A combination of these predictors with Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) methods has direct clinical relevance. DISCUSSION: Evidence-based approaches to personalized treatment help improving the unsatisfactory situation patients and clinicians are faced with, given today's incomplete treatments and the fact that the mechanisms by which antidepressants and antipsychotics ultimately exert their therapeutic effects are only marginally understood.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The therapeutic effects of venlafaxine extended release have been investigated by two prospective observational studies including 8506 patients in the outpatient setting of office based general practitioners and specialists. The efficacy has been documented by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale and by the Hamilton depression (HAMD-21) scale. The tolerability has been assessed by the documentation of adverse events. About (2/3) of the patients were treated because of depression and about (1/3) mainly because of anxiety disorder. The patients of specialists did receive higher dosages and were more severely affected. The response rate on the CGI scale was 87.4 for the patients of general practitioners and 74.2 % for the patients of specialists. The results of the HAMD-21 scale, which has been used by specialists, showed a response rate of 71.8 and a remission rate of 56.3 %. These positive effects could be demonstrated even for the more severely and chronically affected patients. The incidence of adverse events was low in both studies and comparable to the tolerability profile of randomized studies. Importantly, the good tolerability profile was similar even for patients with concomitant cardiovascular disease. In conclusion, these results confirm the efficacy and good tolerability of venlafaxine extended release in the outpatient setting in Germany.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Atypical antipsychotics might become a new treatment option for patients with an impaired impulse regulation as seen in cluster B personality disorders (PD). The aim of the present study is to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in patients with cluster B PD. METHODS: Fifteen in-patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of borderline, histrionic, or narcissistic PD were treated for 8 weeks with quetiapine at a dose of 400 mg/day in an open-label fashion. Effects on impulsivity (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, BIS), depressive symptoms (Hamilton Depression Scale, HAMD, and Beck Depression Inventory, BDI) and side effects (Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale, DOTES) were assessed. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the study. No positive effect on impulsivity (BIS) was found, but a significant improvement on depression scores (HAM-D and BDI) was noted. Adverse effects that might have been due to study medication were mainly anticholinergic and mild-to-moderate. DISCUSSION: The data of our preliminary open-label study do not argue for a general recommendation of quetiapine for the treatment of impulsivity in cluster B PD, but indicate positive effects on depressive symptoms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: According to DSM-IV criteria, dissociative symptoms in borderline personality disorder (BPD) occur in response to stress. Empirical evidence is, however, lacking. METHOD: Using ambulatory monitoring, we assessed dissociative symptoms and subjective ratings of stress every 60 min for 48 h on a palmtop computer in BPD-patients (n = 51), clinical controls (CC; major depression n = 25; panic disorder n = 26), and healthy controls (HC; n = 40). Data analyses were primarily based on hierarchical linear models. RESULTS: In all groups, states of increased stress were paralleled by increased scores of dissociation, thus confirming the hypothesized association between stress and dissociation. The increase in dissociation was more pronounced in BPD-patients when compared with CC and HC. Additionally, BPD-patients reported heightened dissociative experience compared with CC and HC, even after controlling for stress. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that BPD-patients might be prone to dissociation when experiencing stress and are characterized by a generally heightened level of dissociation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To test and compare the efficacy and safety of Hypericum extract WS 5570 to paroxetine, a potent SSRI, in patients suffering from moderate or severe depression according to DSM-IV criteria. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III study, the changes in moderate to severe major depression DSM-IV; 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D total>or=22) after an acute treatment with Hypericum extract WS 5570 or paroxetine were analyzed in a 16-week continuation phase for relapse prevention. Patients with a HAM-D total score decrease of >or=50% during the 6 weeks of acute treatment were asked to continue the treatment for another 4 months. One-hundred and thirty-three adult out-patients who received maintenance doses of 900 (n=33) or 1800 mg/d (n=38) of WS 5570 and 20 (n=28) or 40 mg/d (n=34) of paroxetine, respectively, were included. The relevant dosage was already fixed during the acute treatment. RESULTS: Between baseline of the acute phase and end of continuation treatment the HAM-D total score decreased from 25.3+/-2.5 (mean+/-SD) to 4.3+/-6.2 points for WS 5570 and from 25.3+/-2.6 to 5.2+/-5.5 points for paroxetine (p=0.49, two-sided t-test; median relative decrease: 92.0 and 85.5%, respectively). During maintenance treatment alone (day 154-day 42), 61.6% of the patients randomized to WS 5570 and 54.6% treated with paroxetine showed an additional reduction (p=0.59) with respect to the HAM-D total score. Remission (HAM-D endpoint total score below 8) occurred in 81.6% (31 patients) of the patients for WS 5570 and in 71.4% (30 patients) for paroxetine (p=0.29). Three patients in the WS 5570 group and 2 patients in the paroxetine group showed a HAM-D increase>5 points during continuation treatment. In the continuation phase there were 0.006 adverse events per day of exposure for WS 5570 and 0.007 events for paroxetine. CONCLUSION: This study showed that WS 5570 and paroxetine were similarly effective in preventing relapse in a continuation treatment after recovery from an episode of moderate to severe depression and point therefore to an important alternative treatment option for long-term relapse-prevention.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)