Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The Affordable Care Act of 2010 creates both opportunities and risks for safety-net providers in caring for low-income, diverse patients. New funding for health centers; support for coordinated, patient-centered care; and expansion of the primary care workforce are some of the opportunities that potentially strengthen the safety net. However, declining payments to safety-net hospitals, existing financial hardships, and shifts in the health care marketplace may intensify competition, thwart the ability to innovate, and endanger the financial viability of safety-net providers. Support of state and local governments, as well as philanthropies, will be crucial to helping safety-net providers transition to the new health care environment and to preventing the unintended erosion of the safety net for racially and ethnically diverse populations.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Cobertura del Seguro , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Financiación Gubernamental , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Pacientes no Asegurados/etnología , Seguridad del Paciente , Pobreza , Recompensa , Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Racially/ethnically diverse communities suffer a disproportionate burden of adverse outcomes before, during and after a disaster. Using California as a locus of study, we sought to identify challenges and barriers to meeting the preparedness needs of these communities and highlight promising strategies, gaps in programs, and future priorities. METHODS: We conducted a literature review, environmental scan of organizational Web sites providing preparedness materials for diverse communities, and key informant interviews with public health and emergency management professionals. RESULTS: We identified individual-level barriers to preparing diverse communities such as socioeconomic status, trust, culture, and language, as well as institutional-level barriers faced by organizations such as inadequate support for culturally/linguistically appropriate initiatives. Current programs to address these barriers include language assistance services, community engagement strategies, cross-sector collaboration, and community assessments. Enhancing public-private partnerships, increasing flexibility in allocating funds and improving organizational capacity for diversity initiatives were all identified as additional areas of programmatic need. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests at least four intervention priorities for California and across the United States: engaging diverse communities in all aspects of emergency planning, implementation, and evaluation; mitigating fear and stigma; building organizational cultural competence; and enhancing coordination of information and resources. In addition, this study provides a methodological model for other states seeking to assess their capacity to integrate diverse communities into preparedness planning and response.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Diversidad Cultural , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Etnicidad , Salud Pública/métodos , Grupos Raciales , California , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/métodos , Conducta Cooperativa , Cultura , Planificación en Desastres/métodos , Miedo , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Desarrollo de Programa , Estigma Social , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To understand the interrelationship of literacy, culture, and language and the importance of addressing their intersection. METHODS: Health literacy, cultural competence, and linguistic competence strategies to quality improvement were analyzed. RESULTS: Strategies to improve health literacy for low-literate individuals are distinct from strategies for culturally diverse and individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP). The lack of integration results in health care that is unresponsive to some vulnerable groups' needs. A vision for integrated care is presented. CONCLUSION: Clinicians, the health care team, and health care organizations have important roles to play in addressing challenges related to literacy, culture, and language.
Asunto(s)
Diversidad Cultural , Cultura , Escolaridad , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Lenguaje , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
The tragedy of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans confirmed that effective implementation of public health preparedness programs and policies will require compliance from all racial and ethnic populations. This study reviews current resources and limitations and suggests future directions for integrating diverse communities into related strategies. It documents research and interventions, including promising models and practices that address preparedness for minorities. However, findings reveal a general lack of focus on diversity and suggest that future preparedness efforts need to fully integrate factors related to race, culture, and language into risk communication, public health training, measurement, coordination, and policy at all levels.
Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Diversidad Cultural , Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Etnicidad , Grupos Minoritarios , Administración en Salud Pública , Servicios Urbanos de Salud/organización & administración , Comunicación , Redes Comunitarias , Desastres , Etnicidad/educación , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Louisiana , Grupos Minoritarios/educación , Administración en Salud Pública/economía , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
An analysis of trends in hospital use and capacity by ownership status and community poverty levels for large urban and suburban areas was undertaken to examine changes that may have important implications for the future of the hospital safety net in large metropolitan areas. Using data on general acute care hospitals located in the 100 largest cities and their suburbs for the years 1996, 1999, and 2002, we examined a number of measures of use and capacity, including staffed beds, admissions, outpatient and emergency department visits, trauma centers, and positron emission tomography scanners. Over the 6-year period, the number of for-profit, nonprofit, and public hospitals declined in both cities and suburbs, with public hospitals showing the largest percentage of decreases. By 2002, for-profit hospitals were responsible for more Medicaid admissions than public hospitals for the 100 largest cities combined. Public hospitals, however, maintained the longest Medicaid average length of stay. The proportion of urban hospital resources located in high poverty cities was slightly higher than the proportion of urban population living in high poverty cities. However, the results demonstrate for the first time, a highly disproportionate share of hospital resources and use among suburbs with a low poverty rate compared to suburbs with a high poverty rate. High poverty communities represented the greatest proportion of suburban population in 2000 but had the smallest proportion of hospital use and specialty care capacity, whereas the opposite was true of low poverty suburbs. The results raise questions about the effects of the expanding role of private hospitals as safety net providers, and have implications for poor residents in high poverty suburban areas, and for urban safety net hospitals that care for poor suburban residents in surrounding communities.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/provisión & distribución , Áreas de Pobreza , Adulto , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/economía , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales con Fines de Lucro/provisión & distribución , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Públicos/provisión & distribución , Hospitales Urbanos/clasificación , Hospitales Urbanos/economía , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Filantrópicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Filantrópicos/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Propiedad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Población Suburbana , Estados Unidos , Población UrbanaAsunto(s)
Protección a la Infancia/estadística & datos numéricos , Familia , Bienestar del Lactante/estadística & datos numéricos , Bienestar Materno/estadística & datos numéricos , Prejuicio , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Escolaridad , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pobreza , Embarazo , Embarazo en Adolescencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Salud UrbanaRESUMEN
We examined the progress of the nation's 100 largest cities and their surrounding suburban areas toward achieving Healthy People 2000/2010 goals for two measures of infant health: low birth weight (LBW) and infant mortality (IM). Using data from the National Center for Health Statistics, we compared 1990 and 2000 urban and suburban LBW and IM rates to target rates for Healthy People 2000 and 2010 objectives. Although the 2000 LBW weight rate for the 100 largest cities was higher than the average for the suburbs (8.9% vs. 7.1%), the increase in LBW rates for the suburbs was nearly four times that of the cities (15.7% vs. 4.1%). Suburban and urban white infants led the increases in LBW rates; urban and suburban black infants showed a slight decrease or no change in LBW rates. Neither cities nor suburbs, on average, met the 2000 target rate of 5%. It appears unlikely that most of the 100 largest cities and suburbs will meet the Healthy People 2010 goal, which remains at 5%, without reductions in preterm births, nationally on the rise. The IM rate declined across most cities and suburbs between 1990 and 2000. However, the 100 largest cities on average did not meet the 2000 IM rate target of 7 infant deaths per 1000 live births; their suburbs did (8.5 vs. 6.4, respectively). The cities and suburbs that did not meet the 2000 target may be especially challenged to meet the 2010 goal for IM unless rates of preterm births are reduced. With the continuing black-white disparities in LBW and IM rates and the overall differences in the racial composition of the largest cities and suburbs, strategies for meeting Healthy People goals will likely need to be targeted to the specific populations they serve.