RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The literature on clinical psychophysiology highlights the possibility of using Heart Rate Variability (HRV) as an index of psychophysical balance and resilience to stress. This study investigates the differences in stress reactivity and subsequent recovery between a group of migraineurs and healthy controls. METHODS: Socio-demographic (i.e., sex, age, profession, marital status, and level of education) and psychophysiological (HR and HRV) measures of a group of thirty subjects with migraine (26 migraineurs without aura (86.7%), 2 migraineurs with aura (6.7%), and 2 migraineurs with and without aura (6.7%)) and from thirty healthy control subjects were collected. In particular, HRV was analyzed through frequency-domain parameters, including Low-Frequency (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz) and High-Frequency (HF; 0.15-0.4 Hz) bands as well as LF/HF ratio during a Psychophysiological Stress Profile (PSP) structured in seven phases: (1) Baseline, (2) Objective stressor 1 (Stroop Test), (3) Rest 1, (4) Objective stressor 2 (Mental Arithmetic Task), (5) Rest 2, (6) Subjective stressor (recount a significant life event), and (7) Rest 3. The LF, HF, and LF/HF ratio values were transformed into a logarithmic scale (i.e., log-LF, log-HF, and log LF/HF ratio). Additionally, LF and HF were converted into normalized units (0-100) (i.e., LF% and HF%) which, in turn, were used to obtain reactivity and recovery to stress through delta values (Δ) calculation. RESULTS: Subjects with migraine reported greater ΔLF% levels of reactivity and recovery to subjective stressor, demonstrating a prevalence of sympathetic activity while recounting a personal life event. At the same time, a lowering of the same values was found in the subjects of the group control. DISCUSSION: Our results underline the importance of conducting a psychophysiological assessment in patients with headaches because reduced stress management skills could influence the clinical manifestations of the disease, considering stress as one of the most common triggers for migraine patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The recovery of independence in activities of daily living is a fundamental goal of rehabilitation programs in subjects affected by subacute stroke. Rehabilitation is focused both on motor and cognitive aspects, and some evidence has reported cognitive deficits as prognostic factors of motor recovery. However, rehabilitation is a dynamic process during which executive functions and motor functions should be improved. AIM: The aim of the study is to evaluate the relationships between impairments in cognitive functions and recovery of functional independence in stroke patients during the subacute phase. DESIGN: Multicenter observational study. SETTING: Intensive rehabilitation units. POPULATION: A sample of 319 stroke patients in subacute phase (70.6±11.6 years, 40.4% females), consecutively admitted from November 2019 to July 2021 at sixteen rehabilitation centers were enrolled in this observational, prospective and multicentric study with longitudinal assessments. METHODS: Cognitive and functional assessments were performed at hospital admission and discharge, including Oxford Cognitive Screen, modified Barthel Index, Functional Independent Measure, Fugl-Meyer assessment scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. RESULTS: A regression analysis identified five predictors (out of about 200 tested variables) of functional recovery related to four aspects assessed at admission: functional status (P<0.001), lower limb functioning (P=0.002), attention (P=0.011), and executive functions (P=0.017). Furthermore, patients who recovered deficits in executive functions had the same recovery of those without deficits, whereas those who maintained deficits had a smaller recovery (P=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between cognitive and motor deficits is increasingly highlighted and the recovery of executive functions deficits seems to contribute to motor recovery. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Our results suggest that the recovery of executive functions may promote the recovery of the functional outcome of the patient with subacute stroke. Future treatment protocols may benefit from paying more attention to the recovery of executive functions.