Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Neurosci Nurs ; 53(3): 149-156, 2021 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33935264

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: In August of 2020, the 4th International Neuroscience Nursing Research Symposium was held. The purpose of the symposium was to share neuroscience nursing research from around the world. One of the topics thought most notable that stimulated a crucial conversation was how different countries assessed pain and their use of opioids for pain management. BACKGROUND: Neuroscience nurses are global. What is not known is their experience with and what challenges exist with pain management for human beings in their country. Crossing geographic and cultural boundaries, pain affects all human beings. Each culture has unique values and beliefs regarding pain. Patient barriers, pivotal in this article, included poverty, poor health literacy, opioid phobia, and cultural as well as social beliefs. RESULTS: Neuroscience nurses from Australia, Brazil, Germany, Singapore, India, Ghana, Kenya, Philippines, South Africa, and the United States each collaborated to provide a short summary of assessing pain and use of opioids for pain management for the neuroscience patient. CONCLUSION: Neuroscience patients have varying degrees of pain based on many factors. Various countries have religious, spiritual, and cultural traditions that influence the reporting and management of pain. Pain assessment and management can be challenging, especially for the neuroscience nurses around the world.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Investigación en Enfermería , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Enfermería en Neurociencias , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dimensión del Dolor , Estados Unidos
2.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am ; 32(1): 37-50, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32014160

RESUMEN

Despite advances in understanding the cause of ischemic stroke, cryptogenic stroke remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Approximately 15% to 40% of all ischemic strokes have no identifiable cause. CS is a diagnosis of exclusion after completing the standard stroke work-up. Further investigation needs to be tailored individually according to results of the clinical evaluation so appropriate secondary prevention strategies can be applied.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Examen Neurológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología
3.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am ; 32(1): 67-84, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32014162

RESUMEN

Nearly 20% of all patients with ischemic stroke will require care in an intensive care unit (ICU), particularly those who have received intravenous alteplase or endovascular therapy. Prioritizing nursing intervention and intensive care monitoring can improve patient outcomes and reduce disability. A collaborative interdisciplinary team approach best facilitates the ICU care of an acute stroke patient.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/enfermería , Terapia Trombolítica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA