Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 16(6): e61660, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laryngeal cancer has a significant impact on speech, swallowing, and quality of life. This study aims to analyze laryngeal cancer trends using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, providing insights into its epidemiology. METHODS: Data from the NIS database was analyzed for a cohort of 14,282 laryngeal cancer cases from 2016 to 2019. Baseline characteristics and demographic parameters, including primary expected payer, age groups, hospital types, and geographic regions, were examined. Descriptive statistics and trend analysis were conducted. RESULTS:  The cohort showed consistent annual case numbers (range: 3739-3948). The highest case numbers were in the 40-64 age group (average 1998 cases/year), followed by the 65-80 age group (average 1473 cases/year). Medicare was the most common primary expected payer, followed by Medicaid, private insurance, self-pay, and no charge. The cohort was roughly three times more skewed toward males, with an average of 2936 male cases per year compared to 885 female cases. Notable trends included significant positive correlations with time for urban teaching hospitals, the South region, older age group (65-80 years), and Asian or Pacific Islander individuals. However, the overall correlation between case numbers and time was not statistically significant. The primary expected payer and deaths exhibited moderate correlations with time but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into the baseline characteristics and trends in laryngeal cancer incidence. The observed demographic shifts highlight the need for further investigation into underlying factors influencing case distribution. Understanding these trends can guide targeted interventions for prevention, early detection, and treatment of laryngeal cancer.

2.
Cureus ; 16(5): e61238, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is widely recognized for its association with gastric diseases. Prior studies on the relationship between H. pylori infection and biliary diseases have faced constraints, including inadequate control of confounding factors and small sample sizes. This study aims to explore the association between H. pylori infection and biliary diseases using a large, population-based sample with adequate control for various covariates. METHODS:  The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2020 was used to investigate the association between H. pylori infection and biliary diseases. We identified patients with H. pylori infection using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code (B96.81). Descriptive analysis and inferential statistics, including univariate and multivariate regression, were performed to explore the relationship between H. pylori and selected biliary diseases.  Results: Overall, 32,966,720 patients were analyzed. Among them, 736,585 patients had biliary diseases (n=1,637 with H. pylori and n=734,948 without H. pylori). The baseline characteristics revealed notable differences in demographics and healthcare variables between both groups. Univariate regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between H. pylori infection and various biliary diseases such as gallbladder stones, gallbladder cancer, cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, and biliary pancreatitis, with the highest risk for chronic cholecystitis (odds ratio: 5.21; 95% confidence interval: 4.1-6.62; p<0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for various covariates, confirmed these associations, providing insights into the potential causal relationship between H. pylori and biliary diseases. CONCLUSION:  This study strengthens the evidence suggesting a potential association between H. pylori infection and biliary diseases. The findings need to be validated in prospective clinical studies.

3.
Cureus ; 16(4): e57478, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566782

RESUMEN

Our goal is to conduct a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies to evaluate the efficacy of LigaSure (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) compared with Harmonic (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) devices in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Our search strategy, from inception until March 1, 2024, involved multiple databases, including the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science (WOS), PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We evaluated randomized clinical trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB-2) tool and non-randomized studies using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies for Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. The primary outcomes assessed were operative time, mean length of hospital stay, and the rates of intraoperative complications such as bleeding, organ injury, leakage, and hematoma formation. Additionally, we collected data on postoperative complications, including bleeding, abscess formation, leakage, fever (>38°C), and reoperation rates. Data were analyzed using random-effects models and reported as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using Review Manager software (RevMan, version 5.4 for Windows, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020). Four studies, comprising two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and two retrospective cohort studies, involving a total of 692 patients, were included in the analysis. Both the operative time and length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the LigaSure and Harmonic groups (p>0.05). The pooled analysis also revealed no significant difference between the LigaSure and Harmonic groups in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications (p>0.05). In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant statistical or clinical differences between LigaSure and Harmonic devices in terms of operative outcomes and complication rates in patients undergoing LSG.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA