RESUMEN
The fate and presence of nanoplastics in wastewater treatment systems is a topic of increasing interest. Furthermore, challenges related to their quantification and identification have made it difficult to set up experimental conditions and compare results between studies. In this study, the effect of 100 nm polystyrene nanoplastics on activated sludge was evaluated. A concentration of 2 µg/L was used to continuously feed a sequencing batch reactor (SBR-NPs). Under the experimental conditions used in this study, no changes were observed in the process performance of the SBR-NPs compared to the reactor used as a control. Neither nitrification nor organic matter removal efficiency, which was 96% for both SBRs, were affected by the presence of 100 nm polystyrene nanoplastics, which suggests that the tested nanoplastics were not sufficiently toxic to the biomass. Although no significant differences in the relative abundances of predominant phyla between SBR-Control and SBR-NPs were observed, a slight shift in the relative abundance of Patescibacteria (1.5 ± 0.6% and 3.7 ± 0.8% in SBR-Control and SBR-NPs, respectively, at the end of the test) occurred. The higher abundance of this phylum in SBR-NPs compared to SBR-Control may suggest that these bacteria have some sensitivity to the presence of 100 nm polystyrene nanoplastics. Furthermore, even with the absence of nitrification inhibition, it was observed stagnation of the growth of Nitrotoga bacteria in SBR-NPs, which also suggests that the polystyrene nanoplastics could have an inhibitory effect on these cells and an impact on nitrification in the long term.
Asunto(s)
Aguas del Alcantarillado , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos/métodos , Microplásticos , Poliestirenos , Biomasa , Reactores Biológicos , Bacterias , NitrógenoRESUMEN
In this work, the influence of bisphenol A (BPA) on biological wastewater treatment was studied. For it, two sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) were operated for three months. Both SBRs were fed with synthetic wastewater (SW), adding 1 mg·L-1 of BPA into the feed of reactor SBR-BPA, while the other one operated without BPA as a control reactor (SBR-B). In addition, batch experiments were performed with adapted and non-adapted activated sludge, simulating the reaction step of SBR-BPA, to determine the pathways for BPA removal. Results of batch experiments showed that adsorption and biodegradation were the only significant BPA removal routes. BPA removal by biodegradation was more efficient when adapted biomass was used in the tests (32.2% and 8.2% with adapted and non-adapted biomass, respectively), while BPA adsorption removal route was similar in both types of activated sludge (around 40%). Regarding the SBRs experiments, after 16 days no BPA concentration was detected in SBR-BPA effluent. In the adaptation process, SBR-BPA biomass was more sensitive to low temperatures resulting in higher effluent turbidity, COD and soluble microbial products concentrations than in SBR-B. However, once temperature increased, adapted biomass from SBR-BPA presented higher activity than SBR-B biomass, showing higher values of sludge production, microbial hydrolytic enzymatic activities and specific dynamic respiration rate. The bacterial community study revealed the increase of abundance of Proteobacteria (especially Thiothrix species) and Actinobacteria (especially Nocardioides species) phyla at the expense of Bacteroidetes and Chloroflexi phyla in SBR-BPA during its operation.