RESUMEN

Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are familial neurodegenerative diseases involving the cerebellum and spinocerebellar tracts. While there is variable involvement of corticospinal tracts (CST), dorsal root ganglia, and motor neurons in SCA3, SCA6 is characterized by a pure, late-onset ataxia. Abnormal intermuscular coherence in the beta-gamma frequency range (IMCßγ) implies a lack of integrity of CST or the afferent input from the acting muscles. We test the hypothesis that IMCßγ has the potential to be a biomarker of disease activity in SCA3 but not SCA6. Intermuscular coherence between biceps brachii and brachioradialis muscles was measured from surface EMG waveforms in SCA3 (N = 16) and SCA6 (N = 20) patients and in neurotypical subjects (N = 23). IMC peak frequencies were present in the ß range in SCA patients and in the γ range in neurotypical subjects. The difference between IMC amplitudes in the γ and ß ranges was significant when comparing neurotypical control subjects to SCA3 (p < 0.01) and SCA6 (p = 0.01) patients. IMCßγ amplitude was smaller in SCA3 patients compared to neurotypical subjects (p < 0.05), but not different between SCA3 and SCA6 patients or between SCA6 and neurotypical subjects. IMC metrics can differentiate SCA patients from normal controls.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective : Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are familial neurodegenerative diseases involving the cerebellum and spinocerebellar tracts. While there is variable involvement of corticospinal tracts (CST), dorsal root ganglia, and motor neurons in SCA3, SCA6 is characterized by a pure, late-onset ataxia. Abnormal intermuscular coherence in the beta-gamma frequency range (IMCbg) implies lack of integrity of CST or the afferent input from the acting muscles. We test the hypothesis that IMCbg has the potential to be a biomarker of disease activity in SCA3 but not SCA6. Methods: Intermuscular coherence between biceps and brachioradialis muscles was measured from surface EMG waveforms in SCA3 (N=16) and SCA6 (N=20) patients, and in neurotypical subjects (N=23). Results: IMC peak frequencies were present in the b range in SCA patients and in the g range in neurotypical subjects. The difference between IMC amplitudes in the g and b ranges was significant when comparing neurotypical control subjects to SCA3 (p < 0.01) and SCA6 (p = 0.01) patients. IMCbg amplitude was smaller in SCA3 patients compared to neurotypical subjects (p<0.05), but not different between SCA3 and SCA6 patients or between SCA6 and neurotypical subjects. Conclusion/significance: IMC metrics can differentiate SCA patients from normal controls.