RESUMEN
AIM: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of the patients with anal melanoma (AM), who underwent surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in Kartal Training and Research Hospital between January 2010 and December 2017. All patients, who underwent surgical resection with a diagnosis of AM, were enrolled. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were examined, 8 of them were females, and their average age was 69.2 years (range, 47-85 years). Abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in five (50%) patients, and local excision (LE) was performed in other five (50%) patients. Three patients (30%) had stage I disease, two (20%) had stage II disease, and five (50%) had stage III disease. All five patients in APR group had stage III disease. In the comparison of the survival period after surgery, the mean survival period of the APR group was 6.2 months (range, 1-16 months) while that of the LE group was 19.6 months (range, 7-43 months). CONCLUSION: LE with adjuvant radiation seems to offer good locoregional control without reducing the survival and may be an option of treatment for patients with small, superficial AM. However, APR should be offered for patients with locally advanced disease or as a salvage following recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/cirugía , Melanoma/cirugía , Proctectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Recto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Stoma education has been traditionally given in a one-to-one setting. Since 2007, daily group education programmes were organised for stoma patients and their relatives by our stoma therapy unit. The programmes included lectures on stoma and stoma care, and social activities in which patients shared their experiences with each other. Patients were also encouraged to expand interaction with each other and organise future social events. A total of 72 patients [44 (61.1%) male with a mean (± SD) age of 56.8 ± 13.6 years] with an ileostomy (n= 51, 70.8%), a colostomy (n= 18, 25.0%) or a urostomy (n= 3, 4.2%) were included in the study. Patients were asked to answer a survey (SF-36) face-to-face before the initiation of the programme, which was repeated 3 months later via telephone call. The comparison of pre-education and post-education SF-36 scores revealed a statistically significant improvement in all 8-scale profiles, but not in vitality scale, and both psychometrically-based and mental health summary measures. Analyses disclosed that married patients and those who were living at rural districts seem to have the most improvement in life quality particularly in bodily pain, general health and role-emotional scales and mental health summary measure. In our opinion, group educations may be beneficial for stoma patients, and stoma therapy units may consider organising similar activities.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Neoplasias Urogenitales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Femenino , Procesos de Grupo , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Neoplasias Urogenitales/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to analyze the results of laparoscopy in septuagenarians with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid or rectal resections for cancer were retrospectively selected from the database of our institution. The study group (Lap > 70 group), contained the cancer patients over 70 years old who were treated with laparoscopy. Patients less than 70 years old who underwent a laparoscopic procedure (Lap < 70 group), and those over than 70 years old who underwent conventional surgery (Open > 70 group), were assigned to control groups. Demographics, information regarding tumors, perioperative data, pathological results, and survival in the three groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 56, 166, and 34 patients in the Lap > 70, Lap < 70, and Open > 70 groups, respectively. Patients in the Lap > 70 group were significantly older than other groups. The American Society of Anesthesiologists scores were higher, and the presence of the studied risk factors was more common in the Lap > 70 group than the Lap < 70 group. Intraoperative bleeding and the amount and number of perioperative transfusions required were less in the Lap > 70 group than in the Open > 70 group. The number of harvested lymph nodes was less in the Lap > 70 group than both study groups. Five-year survival in the Lap > 70 group was similar to that in the Lap < 70 group and significantly better than in the Open > 70 group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer in patients over 70 may be feasible and safe as it is in younger patients. The present study has revealed that laparoscopy in the elderly may be superior to conventional techniques as regards some intraoperative findings and survival.