Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cureus ; 16(7): e64446, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39135830

RESUMEN

Introduction Accurate and detailed documentation of surgical operation notes is crucial for post-operative care, research and academic purposes, and medico-legal clarity. Several studies have shown their defiency and inaccuracy sometimes, and some methods have been proposed to make them more objective. This study aimed to evaluate the completeness of thyroidectomy operative notes in a tertiary center and to assess the adequacy of video documentation by comparing it to the corresponding operative notes. Methods A retrospective review of thyroidectomy operative notes from 2010 to 2020 at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, was performed to ensure completeness. Subsequently, 15 thyroidectomies were video recorded, and their notes were compared to the corresponding written operative notes. The completeness score was calculated based on an item list that included items that had to be included in an operative note. An independent samples t-test was used to compare the completeness score means between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the completeness score means between two or more groups. Result A total of 385 thyroidectomy-operative notes were retrospectively reviewed. The completeness scores ranged between 6% and 89% for the various items that had to be documented, with a mean of 54.47%. The mean score of the video-documented operative record was 83.86%±12.84%, which was significantly higher than the corresponding written operative notes (47.53%±18.06%) (p <0.001). Conclusion Video documentation showed significant improvement compared to the corresponding written and retrospective operative notes. Video recording can also be a valuable tool when teaching anatomy and surgical skills and conducting research.

2.
Cureus ; 12(5): e7945, 2020 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32499985

RESUMEN

Background Adenoidectomy is the most commonly performed pediatric operation worldwide and one of the most frequent otorhinolaryngological procedures. It is a safe procedure with a low risk of complications. However, after a successful adenoidectomy, few patients experience symptoms of nasal obstruction, suggestive of adenoid regrowth. Because of various risk factors, patients require a revision adenoidectomy. This study aimed to determine the incidence of revision adenoidectomy at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH). Moreover, we aimed to identify the characteristics and factors that present a risk of revision adenoidectomy in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 680 pediatric patients (age below 18 years) of Saudi and non-Saudi descent who underwent a prior adenoidectomy with or without tonsillectomy, as well as those who underwent a revision adenoidectomy. The data from 2015 to 2018 were obtained from the hospital medical records using a data collection sheet. The data were entered on to a Microsoft excel sheet, and descriptive statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software V21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results The incidence of revision adenoidectomy at our center was 2.79%. We found significant relationships between comorbidities and revision adenoidectomy (p=0.014), initial adenoidectomy without tonsillectomy and revision adenoidectomy (p=0.001), and a young age at initial surgery and revision adenoidectomy. The mean age at initial adenoidectomy was 2.5 years (standard deviation [SD], ±0.607 years), whereas that at revision adenoidectomy was 1.89 years (SD, ±0.737 years). The mean interval between primary and revision adenoidectomies was 42.32 months (range, 9-86 months). Conclusion The incidence of revision adenoidectomy at KAUH was 2.79%. Moreover, only adenoidectomy without a tonsillectomy presented a high risk of adenoid regrowth necessitating a revision adenoidectomy. Therefore, we recommend counseling patients to undergo an adenoidectomy with tonsillectomy to reduce the risk of revision adenoidectomy.

3.
Neurosciences (Riyadh) ; 24(4): 278-283, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31872806

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the awareness of patients with multiple sclerosis about the relationship between smoking and multiple sclerosis in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in 2018 for 162 patients who are attending a tertiary hospital in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Self-administered questionnaire and telephone-based interview were used to collect the data. The Analysis was carried out through a statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software version 21 by using chi-square. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients responded to the questionnaire (response rate, 58.1%). Among the respondents, 56 were current smokers, and 41 of them were males. Thirty-nine patients had a previous cessation attempt, and in 64.1% of the cases, it was mainly a self-made decision. Doctors counseled only 52.7% of the active smokers regarding the effect of smoking on the progression of their disease. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that there a is low level of awareness regarding the risk of smoking on multiple sclerosis. Therefore, educational programs and campaigns would be beneficial to fulfill the gap. Moreover, Health institutions and health care workers should take this issue into account when counseling the patient.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Esclerosis Múltiple/psicología , Pacientes/psicología , Fumar/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Arabia Saudita , Fumar/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA