RESUMEN

BACKGROUND:  Childhood vision impairment (VI) has a significantly harmful effect on both health and social outcomes. AIM:  To assess the causes of childhood VI, to determine obstacles to accessing eye care services and to develop a strategy for the childhood eye care system in African nations. METHOD:  This systematic review was conducted by searching several online databases, including; Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Ebsco and Medline. They focussed on articles available between 2003 and 2023. These studies were conducted to evaluate the causes of childhood VI and to assess obstacles to accessing eye care services in African countries. RESULTS:  The main causes of childhood VI in African nations can be avoided with timely diagnosis and an appropriate management strategy. The leading obstacles to accessing childhood eye care services were a lack of availability, accessibility and affordability. In addition to these barriers, we found that there are concerns with quality of services, primary health care system, geographic barriers, incorrect health beliefs, inappropriate parental perception, a lack of knowledge, attitudes and inadequate practices related to paediatric eye care. CONCLUSION:  The main causes of childhood VI were uncorrected refractive error (RE), amblyopia, cataract and corneal opacities that can be avoided with timely diagnosis and an appropriate management strategy. While the main obstacles to accessing childhood eye care services were a lack of availability, accessibility, affordability and healthcare system.Contribution: The recommended strategy for childhood eye-care services includes models for delivery and training.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To develop criteria to predict visual hemifields with deep perimetric defects based on retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) reflectance, in a transparent process whose components can be assessed by independent laboratories analysing data from their own small groups. METHODS: The analysis was carried out in four stages, using three independent groups of patients-30, 33 and 62 participants-with glaucoma and age-similar controls. The first stage used Group 1 to develop a criterion for RNFL reflectance images at 24, 36 or 48 µm below the inner limiting membrane (ILM). The second stage evaluated the criterion using Group 2. The third stage developed a second criterion to improve performance for Groups 1 and 2 combined. The fourth stage evaluated the second criterion with Group 3. Confidence intervals for sensitivity and specificity were then computed by combining results from all three groups. RESULTS: The first criterion identified all hemifields with deep defects and no hemifields from controls, using a within-eye reference for healthy RNFL. For Group 2, specificity remained high but sensitivity was reduced. The second criterion improved sensitivity by using location-specific reference values. For Group 3, sensitivity remained high but reduced specificity was found. Confidence intervals showed substantial overlap for the two criteria. CONCLUSIONS: We developed two criteria to identify patients with deep perimetric defects with high specificity and sensitivity. Several improvements are warranted: automated identification of the fovea-disc angle and optic disc locations, evaluation of normal variation in patterns of RNFL thickness, improved segmentation of ILM and major vasculature, reduction of within-eye variability in RNFL reflectance of healthy eyes, assessment of effects of image quality, assessment of effects of comorbidity and effectiveness of other devices.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Many studies have assessed structure-function relations in glaucoma, but most without topographical comparison across the central 30°. We present a method for assessing structure-function relations with en face images of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) bundles allowing topographical comparison across much of this retinal area. Forty-four patients with glaucoma (median age 61 years) were recruited and tested with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and perimetry. Six rectangular volume scans were gathered, and then montaged to provide en face views of the RNFL bundles. We calculated the proportion of locations showing a perimetric defect that also showed an en face RNFL defect; and the proportion of locations falling on an RNFL defect that also showed a perimetric defect. A perimetric defect for a location was defined as a total deviation (TD) value equal to or deeper than -4 dB. We found that the median (IQR) number of locations with abnormal RNFL bundle reflectance that also had abnormal TD was 78% (60%) and for locations with abnormal TD that also had abnormal RNFL bundle reflectance was 75% (44%). We demonstrated a potential approach for structure-function assessment in glaucoma by presenting a topographic reflectance map, confirming results of previous studies and including larger retinal regions.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

SIGNIFICANCE: Identifying glaucomatous damage to the macula has become important for diagnosing and managing patients with glaucoma. In this study, we presented an approach that provides better perimetric sampling for the macular region, by testing four locations, with a good structure-function agreement. PURPOSE: We previously presented a basis for customizing perimetric locations within the macula. In this study, we aimed to improve perimetric sampling within the macula by presenting a stimulus at four locations, with maintaining a good structure-function agreement. METHODS: We tested one eye each of 30 patients (aged 50 to 88 years). Patients were selected based on observed structural damage to the macula, whereas perimetric defect (using 24-2) did not reflect the locations and extent of this damage. We used en face images to visualize retinal nerve fiber bundle defects. To measure perimetric sensitivities, we used a blob stimulus (standard deviation of 0.25°) at the 10-2 locations. A perimetric defect for a location was defined as any value equal to or deeper than -4, -5, and -6 dB below the mean sensitivity for 37 age-similar controls (aged 47 to 78 years). We also presented an elongated sinusoidal stimulus for 20 patients at four locations within the macula, in which we defined a perimetric defect as any value below the 2.5th percentile from controls. RESULTS: The -4, -5, and -6 dB criteria identified perimetric defects in 14, 13, and 11 patients, respectively. When testing with the elongated stimulus, 18 patients were identified with perimetric defect. The perimetric defects were consistent with the structural damage. CONCLUSIONS: The elongated stimulus showed a good structure-function agreement with only four testing locations as compared with 68 locations used with the blob stimulus. This demonstrates a clinical potential for this new stimulus in the next generation of perimetry.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of 0.5% and 1% cyclopentolate on the main parameters of the anterior segment (central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber angle (ACA), depth (ACD) and volume (ACV)) in low/moderate myopia and hyperopia along with the effect on IOP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Both eyes of 30 subjects (15 myopic and 15 hyperopic) with mean age±standard deviation of 21.4±3.6 years were enrolled. Each participant was administered two drops of cyclopentolate 1% in the right eye and two drops of cyclopentolate 0.5% in the left eye, 15 minutes apart. All participants underwent intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using noncontact tonometry, and anterior chamber parameter measurement using Pentacam. RESULTS: Following the use of 0.5% and 1% cyclopentolate among the hyperopic group, there was a statistically significant increase in ACD for 1% (pre 2.762±0.28 mm and post 2.89±0.25 mm) and 0.5% (pre 2.71±0.28 and post 2.86±0.27 mm) and ACV for 1% (pre 141.40±20.59 mm3 and post 154.35±19.69 mm3) and 0.5% (pre 137.40±20.48 mm3 and post 152.93±20.50 mm3). In contrast, ACA decreased with both doses 1% and 0.5%, but was not statistically significant (p for both >0.05%). With 0.5% and 1% cyclopentolate among the myopia group, there was a significant increase in ACD following cyclopentolate 1% (pre 3.18±0.22 mm and post 3.25±0.21 mm) and 0.5% (pre 3.200±0.22 mm and post 3.26±0.05 mm), p˂0.05. The ACV was significantly increased following 1% cyclopentolate, p˂0.001. The ACA showed a statistically significant decrease following cyclopentolate 1%, P=0.01, but not a significant decrease after cyclopentolate 0.5%, P=0.170. There was a significant increase in the IOP after 1%, p˂0.001, while a decrease with 0.5%, p=0.008. CONCLUSION: A topical dosage of cyclopentolate 1% showed significant changes in ACA and ACV among the hyperopia and myopic groups compared to 0.5%. Therefore, it is important to consider the use of a 0.5% cyclopentolate dosage to minimize changes to anterior chamber parameters.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Prior studies suggested the use of customized perimetric locations in glaucoma; these studies were limited by imaging only the superficial depths of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and by prolonged perimetric testing. We aimed to develop a rapid perimetric test guided by high-resolution images of RNFL bundles. METHODS: We recruited 10 patients with glaucoma, ages 56 to 80 years, median 68 years, and 10 controls, ages 55 to 77 years, median 68 years. The patients were selected based on discrepancies between locations of glaucomatous damage for perimetric and structural measures. Montaging was used to produce optical coherence tomography en face images of the RNFL covering much of the 24-2 grid locations. In experiment 1, we presented the Goldmann size III stimulus at preselected retinal locations of glaucomatous damage, using just two contrasts. In experiment 2, we developed an elongated sinusoidal stimulus, aligned within the defect, to measure contrast sensitivities; abnormalities were defined based on lower 95% reference limits derived from the controls. RESULTS: The percentage of predicted locations where size III was not seen at 28 dB ranged from 16% to 80%, with a median of 48%. Contrast sensitivity for the sinusoidal stimulus was below the 95% reference range for 37 of 44 stimuli aligned within the defects. CONCLUSIONS: We developed methods for rapid perimetric testing guided by en face images of the RNFL bundles in patients with glaucoma. Results indicated ganglion cell damage under all of the visible RNFL defects. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Customized perimetric locations have potential to improve clinical assessment of glaucoma.

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: It has been recognised that the 24-2 grid used for perimetry may poorly sample the macula, which has been recently identified as a critical region for diagnosing and managing patients with glaucoma. We compared data derived from patients and controls to investigate the efficacy of a basis for customising perimetric locations within the macula, guided by en face images of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) bundles. METHODS: We used SD-OCT en face montages (www.heidelbergengineering.com) of the RNFL in 10 patients with glaucoma (ages 56-80 years, median 67.5 years) and 30 age-similar controls (ages 47-77, median 58). These patients were selected because of either the absence of perimetric defect while glaucomatous damage to the RNFL bundles was observed, or because of perimetric defect that did not reflect the extent and locations of the glaucomatous damage that appeared in the RNFL images. We used a customised blob stimulus for perimetric testing (a Gaussian blob with 0.25° standard deviation) at 10-2 grid locations, to assess the correspondence between perimetric defects and damaged RNFL bundles observed on en face images and perimetric defects. Data from the age-similar controls were used to compute total deviation (TD) and pattern deviation (PD) values at each location; a perimetric defect for a location was defined as a TD or PD value of -0.5 log unit or deeper. A McNemar's test was used to compare the proportions of locations with perimetric defects that fell outside the damaged RNFL bundles, with and without accounting for displacement of ganglion cell bodies. RESULTS: All patients but one had perimetric defects that were consistent with the patterns of damaged RNFL bundles observed on the en face images. We found six abnormal perimetric locations of 2040 tested in controls and 132 abnormal perimetric locations of 680 tested in patients. The proportions of abnormal locations that fell outside the damaged RNFL bundles, with and without accounting for displacement of the ganglion cell bodies were 0.08 and 0.07, respectively. The difference between the two proportions did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.5 for a one-tailed test). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that it is effective to customise perimetric locations within the macula, guided by en face images of the RNFL bundles. The perimetric losses found with a 10-2 grid demonstrated similar patterns as the damaged RNFL bundles observed on the en face images.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

SIGNIFICANCE: Measurements of the macula have been increasingly used to diagnose and manage patients with glaucoma. Asymmetry analysis was clinically introduced to assess damage to the macular ganglion cells in patients with glaucoma, but its effectiveness is limited by high normal between-subject variability. PURPOSE: We aimed to reduce the high normal between-subject variability and improve the potential of asymmetry analysis to identify glaucomatous damage to the macula. METHODS: Twenty patients with glaucoma (aged 57 to 85 years) and 30 age-similar control subjects (aged 53 to 89 years) were recruited from a longitudinal glaucoma study. Participants were imaged with the Spectralis OCT using the posterior pole protocol; measurements of the averaged retinal thickness and ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness were obtained. We established three zones per hemifield within the central ±9°, based on the lowest between-subject variability that we previously found and the course of retinal nerve fiber layer projections. The criteria for flagging abnormality were at least two contiguous zones when P < 5% or one zone when P < 1% with two-tailed tests. RESULTS: Between-subject variability of the asymmetry analysis for both retinal and GCL thicknesses remained lower than that of the average thickness across each zone in control subjects (F > 2.52, P < .01). Asymmetry analysis of retinal and GCL thicknesses flagged 16 and 18 of 20 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Between-subject variability was reduced in control subjects using the three zones; our criteria identified glaucomatous damage to the macula in most of the patients. We used high-density B-scans to confirm the patterns of the glaucomatous damage we found in this study.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of asymmetry analysis to reduce between-subject variability of macular thickness measurements using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. METHODS: Sixty-three volunteers (33 young subjects [aged 21 to 35 years] and 30 older subjects [aged 45 to 85 years]) free of eye disease were recruited. Macular images were gathered with the Spectralis optical coherence tomography. An overlay 24- by 24-degree grid was divided into five zones per hemifield, and asymmetry analysis was computed as the difference between superior and inferior zone thicknesses. We hypothesized that the lowest variation and the highest density of ganglion cells will be found approximately 3 to 6 degrees from the foveola, corresponding to zones 1 and 2. For each zone and age group, between-subject SDs were compared for retinal thickness versus asymmetry analysis using an F test. To account for repeated comparisons, p < 0.0125 was required for statistical significance. Axial length and corneal curvature were measured with an IOLMaster. RESULTS: For OD, asymmetry analysis reduced between-subject variability in zones 1 and 2 in both groups (F > 3.2, p < 0.001). Standard deviation for zone 1 dropped from 12.0 to 3.0 µm in the young group and from 11.7 to 2.6 µm in the older group. Standard deviation for zone 2 dropped from 13.6 to 5.3 µm in the young group and from 11.1 to 5.8 µm in the older group. Combining all subjects, neither retinal thickness nor asymmetry analysis showed a strong correlation with axial length or corneal curvature (R² < 0.01). Analysis for OS yielded the same pattern of results, as did asymmetry analyses between eyes (F > 3.8, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetry analysis reduced between-subject variability in zones 1 and 2. Combining the five zones together produced a higher between-subject variation of the retinal thickness asymmetry analysis; thus, we encourage clinicians to be cautious when interpreting the asymmetry analysis printouts.

Asunto(s)