RESUMEN

The research presented here evaluates the delivery of Happy Being Me (HBM; Dunstan, Paxton & McLean, 2017) with boys and girls in their first year of secondary school in the UK (Year 7 and after comparisons aged 11-12). HBM is a manualised universal prevention programme which aims to improve body dissatisfaction and associated risk factors. Risk factors studied here were internalization of the thin ideal, physical appearance comparisons, appearance conversations. Secondary outcomes measured were self-esteem and eating disorder symptomsStudy 1 tested the effectiveness of HBM (n = 172) compared to a control group (n = 197) who received curriculum as usual. HBM resulted in significantly improved body satisfaction post-intervention which was maintained at follow up. There were no significant changes in risk factors.Study 2 compared clinician (n = 172) and teacher (n = 174) delivery. Students who received clinician-led, but not teacher-led, HBM had improved body satisfaction and this was maintained at follow up. Internalization of the thin ideal and self-esteem, improved in both clinician and teacher-led groups with small to medium sized effects. HBM can be delivered by clinicians independent of programme developers in a heterogeneous sample with positive effects on body satisfaction. Issues arising for wider delivery are discussed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the United Kingdom, ethnic minority group's particularly British South Asian women have higher rates of depression than their white counterparts. Despite this they remain under represented in mental health trials. Whilst the US legislation mandates the inclusion of ethnic minorities into research, there are no similar initiatives in the UK. Barriers in recruiting these hard to reach ethnic groups are cited as major reasons behind this under representation. Once these barriers are encountered it becomes a challenge for the researchers to overcome them. As there is paucity of research in this specific area through this paper we want to share our strategies in recruiting British South Asians thus encouraging other researchers to consider ethnic minority inclusion into research. METHODS: Our published systematic review on the barriers to recruitment of ethnic minority participants into mental health research developed a typology of thirty three ethnic recruitment barriers described under five themes. We aimed to find strategies to overcome these barriers from five depression trials for British South Asians conducted by our research group. Firstly we extracted data on recruitment strategies from the published papers. Later researchers involved in these five trials formed a working group to add to these extracted strategies. Finally these strategies were matched to the individual barriers described in the typology. RESULTS: Multiple recruitment strategies were described by the researchers. These strategies were matched to all but two recruitment barriers related to psychopathology/substance misuse by the participants and paucity of healthcare related resources. Multiple strategies were found to be effective against each barrier and appropriate ones could be selected by the researchers after considering available resources at hand. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this paper have implications for the design of recruitment strategies for hard to recruit ethnic minority groups to health care research. There is need for wider training and support of researchers to give them the skills to recruit these ethnic groups. Further development and evaluation of these strategies will lead to increased recruitment accruals.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The ethnic minority population in developed countries is increasing over time. These groups are at higher risk of mental illness and demonstrate lower participation in research. Published evidence suggests that multiple factors like stigma, lack of trust, differences in explanatory models, logistical issues and lack of culturally aware researchers act as barriers to ethnic minority recruitment into mental health research. To reduce inequalities in participation, there is a need to devise innovative and culturally sensitive recruitment strategies. It is important that researchers share their experience of employing these strategies so that ethnic minority participation can be facilitated. METHODS: We previously published a systematic review of barriers to recruiting ethnic minority participants into mental health research. The nine papers included in our prior review formed the basis for developing a typology of barriers to recruiting ethnic minorities into mental health research. This typology identified 33 barriers, described under five themes. We further extracted data on the strategies used to overcome these recruitment barriers, as described in the included studies. RESULTS: The strategies employed by the authors could be matched to all but two barriers (psychopathology/substance misuse and limited resource availability). There was evidence that multiple strategies were employed, and that these depended upon the population, clinical set-up and resources available. CONCLUSIONS: This typology of strategies to overcome barriers to recruiting ethnic minorities provides guidance on achieving higher rates of recruitment. It is important that researchers plan to deploy these strategies well in advance of initiating recruitment. Whilst adopting these strategies, the authors have not been able to quantify the positive impact of these strategies on recruitment. The typology should encourage researchers to employ these strategies in future research, refine them further and quantitatively evaluate their impact.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)