RESUMEN
Background Endometriosis is a prevalent gynecological disorder characterized by extra-uterine endometrial-like tissue, causing substantial morbidity, including chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Little is known about the correlation between imaging findings and pain severity in endometriosis. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study, enrolling 150 women diagnosed with endometriosis. Clinical, imaging (MRI and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)), and histopathological criteria were used for diagnosis. Pain severity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Statistical analysis included multivariate regression to identify predictors of pain severity. Results Imaging revealed common sites of endometriosis involvement, predominantly ovaries (73.3%) and rectovaginal septum (40%). Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) was present in 30% of patients, predominantly affecting uterosacral ligaments (66.7% of DIE cases). Patients with ovarian endometriomas and DIE exhibited significantly higher VAS scores (7.6 ± 1.5 and 8.0 ± 1.2, respectively) compared to those without (6.5 ± 1.9 and 6.9 ± 1.8, respectively). Surgical intervention led to a significant reduction in VAS scores (from 7.4 ± 1.6 to 3.2 ± 1.7, p < 0.001), correlating with reductions in lesion size and extent observed in follow-up imaging. Conclusion Advanced imaging techniques, particularly MRI and TVUS, play a critical role in assessing pain severity in endometriosis. Ovarian endometriomas and DIE are independent predictors of increased pain severity, guiding personalized treatment strategies. Surgical excision of lesions, particularly in cases of DIE, offers substantial pain relief and improves quality of life, emphasizing the integration of imaging in clinical decision-making for optimal endometriosis management.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceived availability of various services provided by Autism centers in our region. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted from March to May 2015 involving health care workers at various governmental and private autism centers in Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. A structured 30-item questionnaire was designed to assess their demographics, training, experience, and the availability of various services at their centers. RESULTS: Twelve autism centers were included and 136 employees participated in the study. Seventy-eight (57%) participants indicated that their center lacked important and essential services. These included programs for home care and outreach (59%), family recognition incentives and rewards (51%), integrative educational programs (39%), and occupational therapy (16%). Access for outside referral for these services was available in only 24% of cases. They cited several major obstacles in providing adequate service including; family involvement (24%), child`s behavioral problems (13%), increased number of students (9%), and work environment and space (5%). CONCLUSION: Significant deficiencies exist in the availability of autism services in our region. Access for referrals for important services is also limited. We identified several areas that can be targeted to help develop, promote, and improve the provided services for children with autism spectrum disorder.