Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) ; 21(4): 248-257, 2021 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty can be carried out using either fresh, frozen autologous bone or synthetic substitutes. Ordering artificial 3 dimensional (3D) implants is challenging and time consuming depending on geographical location. In this article, we share our experience using a streamlined process of producing 3D computer-assisted design (CAD) implants using commercially available 3D printers and silicone molds that can be easily replicated with consistent results and are associated with good outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To develop patient-specific implants for patients with cranial defects that are accurate, consistent, low cost, and easy to replicate while reducing operator-dependent factors. METHODS: We present data from 15 patients who underwent cranioplasty with 3D CAD-designed gentamicin-impregnated bone cement implants that were molded using the cold injection technique. RESULTS: The technique was consistent in result production, required little postdemolding manipulation, and showed no dimensional variation in design. Postoperative computed tomography scans showed excellent implant fit, and patients had a low complication rate. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated a technique of mold preparation that is efficient and that produces a reliable result. Polymethyl methacrylate implants molded using this technique showed better reproducibility, higher accuracy, and precision than other types of implants and required minimal postdemolding clean-up.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Polimetil Metacrilato , Gentamicinas , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cráneo/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA