RESUMEN
Background: In 2023, the Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) published "Compounded peptides: An Obesity Medicine Association Position Statement." Since this publication, the use of compounded peptides for the treatment of obesity has continued to evolve, leading to additional confusion and questions from obesity medicine clinicians and their patients. Methods: This frequently asked questions (FAQ) document and "Call for Action" commentary is based upon the existing evidence and practical clinical experiences of the authors. Results: This FAQ is intended to provide insights beyond the original 2023 OMA Position Statement regarding the use of "compounded peptides" for treating obesity. Three obstacles impair patient access to highly effective peptide anti-obesity medications: insufficient production especially during times of high demand, high costs, and lack of clarity surrounding the role of compounded peptides. Solutions to enhance patient access to these medications lie within the existing legal and regulatory framework and Food and Drug Administration policies. Implementing these solutions necessitates dispelling misinformation and providing clear guidance on the appropriate prescribing and administration of compounded peptides, particularly during times of acknowledged shortage. Conclusion: Among stakeholders with aligned priorities, challenges can often be overcome by collaboration and communication. Towards the goal of providing patient-centered care, the OMA calls on applicable stakeholders (e.g., pharmaceutical companies, compounding pharmacy organizations, health insurance companies, and the Food and Drug Administration) to work collaboratively to achieve a consensus that improves patient access to safe anti-obesity medications. The purpose of this "Call to Action" is to ask stakeholders to provide clinicians and their patients clarity regarding the role of compounded peptide anti-obesity medications during times of FDA-acknowledged shortages. Finally, this FAQ review provides clinicians with a simple and practical checklist respective to the potential use of compounded peptides.
RESUMEN
Background: Certification of obesity medicine for physicians in the United States occurs mainly via the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM). Obesity medicine is not recognized as a subspecialty by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) or the American Osteopathic Association (AOA). This review examines the value of specialization, status of current ABOM Diplomates, governing bodies involved in ABMS/AOA Board Certification, and the advantages and disadvantages of an ABMS/AOA recognized obesity medicine subspecialty. Methods: Data for this review were derived from PubMed and appliable websites. Content was driven by the expertise, insights, and perspectives of the authors. Results: The existing ABOM obesity medicine certification process has resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of Obesity Medicine Diplomates. If ABMS/AOA were to recognize obesity medicine as a subspecialty under an existing ABMS Member Board, then Obesity Medicine would achieve a status like other ABMS recognized subspecialities. However, the transition of ABOM Diplomates to ABMS recognized subspecialists may affect the kinds and the number of physicians having an acknowledged focus on obesity medicine care. Among transition issues to consider include: (1) How many ABMS Member Boards would oversee Obesity Medicine as a subspecialty and which physicians would be eligible? (2) Would current ABOM Diplomates be required to complete an Obesity Medicine Fellowship? If not, then what would be the process for a current ABOM Diplomate to transition to an ABMS-recognized Obesity Medicine subspecialist (i.e., "grandfathering criteria")? and (3) According to the ABMS, do enough Obesity Medicine Fellowship programs exist to recognize Obesity Medicine as a subspecialty? Conclusions: Decisions regarding a transition to an ABMS recognized Obesity Medicine Subspecialty versus retention of the current ABOM Diplomate Certification should consider which best facilitates medical access and care to patients with obesity, and which best helps obesity medicine clinicians be recognized for their expertise.