Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Access ; 18(1): 22-25, 2017 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27911463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Native arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are preferred while central venous catheters (CVCs) are least suitable vascular access (VA) in patients requiring hemodialysis (HD). Unfortunately, around 80% of patients start HD with CVCs. Late referral to nephrologist is thought to be a factor responsible for this. We retrospectively analyzed the types of VA at HD initiation in renal transplant recipients followed by nephrologists with failed transplant. If early referral to nephrologist improves AVF use, these patients should have higher prevalence of AVF at HD initiation. METHODS: All patients who failed their kidney transplants from January 2002 to April 2013 were included in the study. Data regarding planning of VA by nephrologist, documented discussion about renal replacement therapy (RRT), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 6 months and last clinic visit before HD initiation, time of VA referral, and subsequent VA at dialysis initiation were gathered and analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients failed their transplants during study period. Data were inaccessible in six patients. Eleven patients started peritoneal dialysis (PD) while 66 started HD. Thirty-two had previous functioning VA while 34 needed VA. There were 11/34 patients (32%) with eGFR <15 mL/min at six months while 21/34 (61%) had eGFR <15 mL/min at last clinic visit before HD initiation. Only 11/34 (32%) had documented RRT discussion, 8/34 (24%) had VA referral, and 7/34 (21%) had vein mapping. A total of 30/34 (88.3%) started HD with CVC while 4/34 (11.3%) started HD with AVF (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early referral to nephrologist by itself may not improve VA care amongst patient with end-stage renal disease.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Nefrología/métodos , Diálisis Renal , Adulto , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrólogos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Semin Dial ; 27(1): E1-3, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24028085

RESUMEN

Preserved anatomical integrity of the anterior abdominal wall is considered important in the presurgical evaluation of a patient who is being considered for placement of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter. Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is the excessive widening or separation between the two bellies of the rectus abdominis muscle. The separation can occur anywhere along the linea alba and at times has been found to span the entire length from the xiphosternal angle to the pubic bone. Presence of DRA can pose a surgical challenge in the peritoneoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter. In this report, we discuss a case of successful placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter with peritoneoscope technique and successful initiation of peritoneal dialysis in a chronic kidney disease patient with DRA.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/métodos , Endoscopios , Enfermedades Musculares/complicaciones , Diálisis Peritoneal , Recto del Abdomen , Anciano , Humanos , Insuflación , Masculino , Cavidad Peritoneal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA