RESUMEN

Background: Rhinitis medicamentosa is a nonallergic inflammation of the nasal mucosa caused by topical decongestants overuse. It mainly affects young and middle-aged adults. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes of pharmacists regarding the utilization of over-the-counter intranasal decongestants. Methods: An online cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to January 2022. The target population of the study included pharmacists who work in community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of having positive attitude towards controlling the use of decongestant. Results: A total of 220 participants were included in this study. Around 15.0% of them reported that ND come with a physician prescription. The majority of the participants (87.3%) reported that the less than 5 days is the maximum safe duration for the use of NDs. Overall, the study participants demonstrated moderately positive attitude towards controlling the use of decongestant with a mean attitude score of 2.5 (standard deviation: 1.2) out of 5; which represents 50.0% of the maximum score. Binary logistic regression analysis identified that pharmacists aged 31-40 years were two-folds more likely to have positive attitude towards controlling the use of decongestant compared to others (p<0.05). Around 45.9% of them reported that they recommend other over-the-counter treatments like nasal irrigation, nasal steroids, or antihistamine if they see a patient with RM asking for ND with or without prescription. Conclusion: The majority of pharmacists in Saudi Arabia demonstrated sufficient awareness and understanding on the adverse effects associated with the excessive use of NDs. Rhinitis medicamentosa can be avoided by appropriate measures, highlighting the importance of raising awareness about the excessive use of decongestants among healthcare professionals and patients alike.

RESUMEN

The occurrence of occult metastases in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) to lower levels in the neck (levels IV and V) or development of skip metastases that bypass the upper neck levels (levels I to III) and go directly to level IV or V is common. This challenges the efficacy of conventional neck dissection approaches in the treatment of OSCC. Therefore, the decision to include lower levels cervical nodes during elective neck dissection of OSCC remains controversial. This systematic review was designed to assess the prevalence of level IV and/or V involvement or skip metastases in patients with the clinically negative neck (cN0) or positive (cN+) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We searched for studies published between December 2000 and December 2020. Potentially relevant abstracts and full-text articles were screened, and data from the studies were extracted. Quality was rated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria. In total, 802 abstracts and 227 full-text articles were screened, and 32 studies were included in this analysis. The prevalence of metastasis ranged from 1.8% to 66.0%. The incidence for skip metastasis to level IV or V was low, reaching 8.5%. Evidence favored elective neck dissection, including levels I to III, in selected patients with OSCC and patients with cN0 or cN+ neck. The literature was non-conclusive on the recommendation for inclusion of lower levels.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To validate and assess the reliability of the new version of an Arabic speech intelligibility rating among di erent raters. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis was carried out between December 2018 and January 2019. Thirty cochlear-implant (CI) children (study group) and 30 subjects (control group) were enrolled. Study candidates' speech skills were evaluated using the translated Arabic SIR by parents and original SIR by professions such as speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Inter-rater agreement, test-retest reliability, pre- and post-intervention score (responsiveness test), patient versus control score comparison (discriminant validity), and cross-validation of Arabic SIR have all been assessed. RESULTS: There was a good sense of agreement between the post-operative SIR parents' assessments and the professional SLPs' assessments (r=0.920, p less than 0.001). The mean of study subjects pre- and post-implantation score of Arabic SIR showed a statistically significant difference (p less than 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Arabic SIR demonstrated excellent reliability with strong consistency. It showed its clinical ability in distinguishing healthy subjects from patients along with follow up of speech development skills over time. The Arabic SIR can be used by parents to evaluate post-CI progress of their children.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the perceptions of patients on whether they receive sufficient information about their medical problems, their preferences to obtain information, and factors that may influence their preferences. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study conducted in a primary health-care center affiliated with the National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients attending the center between October and December 2010 were interviewed using a questionnaire developed to meet the objectives of the study. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients participated in the study. The mean (±standard deviation) age of the participants was 43 (±16) years. Reported cases of dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension among participants were 42%, 39%, and 31%, respectively. A minority of the participants indicated that they had a sufficient knowledge of their medical problems. The vast majority of the patients (92%) indicated that their preference to be informed about available treatment options and the plan for their future treatment. However, only 38% indicated that they had been told about the available treatment options, and less than half (48%) were informed about their future treatment plan. The proportion of male patients who preferred to know the treatment plan for their medical problems was significantly more than that of females (P < 0.001); nevertheless, female participants perceived that they had been better informed about their treatment plan than the male participants (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients receive information about their medical problems much less than their expectations. Measures to promote patient education and their involvement in shared care process should be considered and implemented to minimize serious health outcomes.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine preferences of patients regarding their involvement in the clinical decision making process and the related factors in Saudi Arabia.   METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a major family practice center in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between March and May 2012. Multivariate multinomial regression models were fitted to identify factors associated with patients preferences.  RESULTS: The study included 236 participants. The most preferred decision-making style was shared decision-making (57%), followed by paternalistic  (28%), and informed consumerism (14%). The preference for shared clinical decision making was significantly higher among male patients and those with higher level of education, whereas paternalism was significantly higher among older patients and those with chronic health conditions, and consumerism was significantly higher in younger age groups. In multivariate multinomial regression analysis, compared with the shared group, the consumerism group were more likely to be female [adjusted odds ratio  (AOR) =2.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-6.27, p=0.008] and non-dyslipidemic (AOR=2.90, 95% CI: 1.03-8.09, p=0.04), and the paternalism group were more likely to be older (AOR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, p=0.04), and female (AOR=2.47, 95% CI: 1.32-4.06, p=0.008).  CONCLUSION: Preferences of patients for involvement in the clinical decision-making varied considerably. In our setting, underlying factors that influence these preferences identified in this study should be considered and tailored individually to achieve optimal treatment outcomes.

Asunto(s)