RESUMEN
Background: The involvement of husbands and male partners in childbirth no longer ceases at conception and pregnancy, rather fathers wish to be more involved in supporting their partners during childbirth. This aligns with the World Health Organization's (WHO) call for promoting male participation in childbirth, emphasising the benefits of support and the positive impact attending childbirth has for husbands/partners, and their maternal partner. This knowledge has led to global initiatives promoting "humanised" birth and a family-approach. To gain in-depth insight and understanding of childbirth attendance from the perspectives of fathers, a qualitative evidence synthesis is proposed. Methods: To explore fathers' experiences, views, and perspectives of childbirth attendance. All studies that used qualitative methodologies to explore the phenomenon of interest will be included. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MIDIRS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar will be systematically searched from their dates of inception to present, supplemented by a search for grey literature and a search of the reference list of included studies. Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) will be used to ensure the comprehensiveness of the search strategy. Methodological quality assessment of included studies, using The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme assessment tool, and will be extracted from the included studies by two reviewers independently using a standard data extraction form. Thomas and Harden's three-stage approach will be used to thematically synthesise the data: coding of data, developing descriptive themes, and generation of analytical themes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual confidence in the synthesised findings Comprehensive insight and understanding of fathers' perspectives of childbirth attendance will be ascertained. PROSPERO Registration No: CRD42023470902.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Formally counting fetal movements in pregnancy is one of the oldest methods to assess fetal well-being. Although not routinely recommended in contemporary maternity care, due to a lack of evidence of its effectiveness, formal fetal movement counting is still practiced in many birth settings. Requesting women to formally count their fetal movements in a structured, objective way that can potentially improve maternal subjective outcomes such as worry or concern. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of formal fetal movement counting versus no formal counting, on maternal worry, concern or anxiety, and maternal-fetal attachment (MFA). Secondary outcomes were compliance with the intervention (counting method) and hospital admission/attendance for fetal activity concerns. METHODS: CINAHL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched systematically for eligible studies from inception dates to June 2020, supplemented by searches of trial databases, grey literature and the reference lists of included studies. Randomized controlled and quasi-randomized trials were included in the review. RESULTS: Nine studies reported across 15 publications were included involving 70824 pregnant women. The results showed that MFA levels were significantly higher in women who formally counted fetal movements than those who did not (standardized mean difference=0.72; 95% CI: 0.10-1.33, five studies, 1565 women). There were no differences between the groups in maternal anxiety or worry/concern outcomes. Attendance or admission rates for reduced fetal movements, or concern for fetal activity, did not differ between the groups (OR=1.36; 95% CI: 0.97-1.91, three studies, 1947 women). Compliance in completing fetal movement charts varied, ranging 45-90%, although definitions of compliance differed across studies, which may have affected rates. CONCLUSIONS: This review has found that formal fetal movement counting in pregnancy has no detrimental effects on maternal psychological or emotional status and positively affects maternal-fetal attachment. Although current evidence does not support the use of formal fetal movement counting for improving perinatal outcomes, such as stillbirth and neonatal death, the results of this review are helpful for clinicians in discussing fetal movements in pregnancy and in discussing the optional methods available to women who may be advised to or choose to objectively assess fetal movements using a formal fetal movement counting method.