RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is an assessment tool used to objectively evaluate clinical competence in medical schools and, more recently, in the nursing profession as well. However, few studies have been conducted to elicit the views of dental students in KSA regarding the OSCE. The present study was designed to explore, evaluate, and analyse students' perceptions of the OSCE and to explore the strengths and weaknesses of this assessment tool as perceived by dental students. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analytical observational study using a survey design. It took place in the College of Dentistry, Taibah University, KSA. The study sample consisted of third, fourth, and fifth-year students who took the OSCE assessment during their studies. RESULTS: Of 138 invited students, 119 responded (response rate of 86.2%). Almost half the students (47.1%) agreed that the OSCE exam was fair, while 19.3% agreed that a broad range of clinical skills were included in the OSCE exam. A low percentage of students believed to a great extent that the scores were standardised; however, the practicality and usefulness of the OSCE was questioned. Students perceived that issues pertaining to personality, ethnicity, and gender would not impact the scores. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicated that the OSCE is a meaningful and fair assessment tool for clinical skills.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of retreatment and reciprocating rotary systems in removing gutta-percha filling material from root-canal systems. METHODS: A total of 90 single-canal human teeth were instrumented using a F3 ProTaper file and obturated with gutta-percha and the Tubliseal sealer using the lateral-compaction technique. They were divided into five groups according to the rotary system used to remove the filling material: Reciproc, which used the Reciproc-R25 file; WaveOne, which used the WaveOne-Primary file; S1, which used the S1 (25/.06) file; ProTaper-R, which used the ProTaper-Retreatment system; and Mtwo-R, which used the Mtwo®-Retreatment system. The time required to remove the filling material (min) and the associated instrument separation, if any, were recorded. Teeth were cleaved longitudinally and photographed with a high-resolution camera. Images were imported to the AutoCAD application to measure the remaining filling material and the root-canal space. Data were analysed using the one-way analysis of variance and Chi-squared tests. RESULTS: The Mtwo-R group showed the highest mean remaining filling material (51%) (p < 0.001), with no significant differences among the other groups. The ProTaper group required the least time for filling-material removal (4.95 min), with significant differences compared to the other groups (p < 0.05), except the WaveOne group (5.83 min; p = 1.000). Overall, 13 instruments (15.9%) were used for filling-material removal, with a significantly greater proportion in the Mtwo-R group (33.3%) compared to the other groups (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, reciprocating rotary systems were as effective as retreatment rotary systems in removing root-canal filling material. The Mtwo-R system showed the poorest performance with respect to removal effectiveness and instrument separation.
RESUMEN
AIM: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the marginal accuracy and internal fit of complete cast crowns and three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) cast with commercially pure titanium (CPTi) and Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V). METHODS AND MATERIALS: CPTi and Ti-6Al-4V alloy were used to cast twelve single crowns and twelve three-unit FPDs. A traveling microscope was used to measure marginal gap and discrepancies in internal fit. Two and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses were used to determine the effects of the marginal and internal fit discrepancies. RESULTS: The Ti-6Al-4V alloy demonstrated a significantly smaller marginal gap than CPTi (P<0.0001). The recorded marginal discrepancies for both metals were within a clinically accepted range (<100 microm). The single crown fit discrepancy was significantly smaller than the three-unit FPD for both the CPTi and the Ti-6Al-4V alloy (P<0.0001). For the internal fit discrepancy, the occlusal surface showed the greatest gaps. CONCLUSIONS: The Ti-6Al-4V alloy demonstrated a better fit than CPTi. Single crowns showed an improved fit when compared with the three-unit FPD. Mid-occlusal internal gap demonstrated greater values than the axial internal gap. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This in vitro study suggested marginal fit of complete crowns and three-unit FPDs cast by CPTi or Ti-6Al-4V alloy were within the range of what is clinically acceptable for longevity of restorations.