RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Re-exploration of bleeding after cardiac surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Perioperative blood loss and rate of re-exploration are variable among centers and surgeons. OBJECTIVE: To present our experience of low rate of re-exploration based on adopting checklist for hemostasis and algorithm for management. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted for 565 adult patients who underwent surgical treatment of congenital and acquired heart disease and were complicated by postoperative bleeding from Feb 2006 to May 2019. Demographics of patients, operative characteristics, perioperative risk factors, blood loss, requirements of blood transfusion, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of re-exploration and determinants of adverse outcome. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (1.14%) were reexplored for bleeding. An identifiable source of bleeding was found in 11 (84.6%) patients. Risk factors for re-exploration were high body mass index, high Euro SCORE, operative priority (urgent/emergent), elevated serum creatinine and low platelets count. Re-exploration was significantly associated with increased requirements of blood transfusion, adverse effects on cardiorespiratory state (low ejection fraction, increased s. lactate, and prolonged period of mechanical ventilation), longer intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, increased incidence of SWI, and higher mortality (15.4% versus 2.53% for non-reexplored patients). We managed 285 patients with severe or massive bleeding conservatively by hemostatic agents according to our protocol with no added risk of morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION: Low rate of re-exploration for bleeding can be achieved by strict preoperative preparation, intraoperative checklist for hemostasis implemented by senior surgeons and adopting an algorithm for management.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Lista de Verificación , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/normas , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Background: Sternal wound complications pose a tremendous challenge post-cardiac surgery. There's no consensus or clear guidelines to deal with them. We propose that simple and more objective classification helps to organize the range of sternal wound complications and suggest a relevant treatment strategy. Methods: One-hundred-sixteen cases of sternal wound complications retrospectively were reviewed out of 2,391 adult patients, who underwent full sternotomy during cardiac surgery from 2006 to 2018. Eighty-six cases conservatively were managed and the remaining 30 cases required surgical intervention. More objective classification was proposed and less invasive fasciocutaneous flap was considered for nearly all reconstructive procedures. Results: The incidence of sternal wound complications was 4.8%. Conservative management was adopted for 86 cases, mean duration was 11.19 ± 9.8 days. Surgical management was performed in 30 patients (25.86%); 28 (93.3%) of whom recovered with good outcomes with less invasive fasciocutaneous flap done for 13 cases. Two cases had recurrence; one conservatively was managed and other was reoperated and healed well. The most common organisms in recurrent infections were N. coagulase (29.8%), Klebsiella (12.5%), pseudomonas (10.5%), and MRSA (10.5%). We had 4 mortalities. None of the mortalities were related to sternal wound complications; one was related to the cardiac surgery. Conclusions: Sternal wound complications are grave events. Objective classification and proper management selection will gain better outcomes.