RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare outcomes with radial vs femoral approach in female patients undergoing coronary angiography. BACKGROUND: Women undergoing cardiac procedures have increased risk of bleeding and vascular complications, but are under-represented in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving coronary angiography. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing outcomes in women undergoing angiography with radial vs femoral approaches. The primary outcome was non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) related bleeding at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE; a composite of death, stroke or myocardial infarction), vascular complications, procedure duration, and access-site crossover. RESULTS: Four studies (n = 6041 female patients) met the inclusion criteria. In female patients undergoing coronary angiography, radial access decreased non-CABG related bleeding (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.72; P<.001), MACCE (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93; P=.01), vascular complications (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.75; P<.001) with no significant difference in procedure time (mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.97 to 0.89; P=.93). There was an increase in access-site crossover using the radial approach (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.24-3.63; P<.001). Patients undergoing radial approach were more likely to prefer radial access for the next procedure (OR, 6.96; 95% CI, 5.70-8.50; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In female patients undergoing coronary angiography or intervention, the radial approach is associated with decreased bleeding, MACCE, and vascular complications. These data suggest that radial access should be the preferred approach for women.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Current guidelines recommend dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), although some studies suggest mono-antiplatelet therapy is equally efficacious with an improved safety profile. We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing DAPT with mono-antiplatelet therapy after TAVI. Study quality and heterogeneity were assessed using Jadad score, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and Cochran's Q statistics. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using fixed effect models as the primary analysis. Eight studies including 2,439 patients met the inclusion criteria. At 30 days, DAPT was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (OR 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34 to 3.18, p = 0.001), major or life-threatening bleeding (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.59, p <0.001), and major vascular complications (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.51 to 3.06, p <0.001). There was no difference in the rate of the combined end point of stroke or transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction. Outcome data up to 6 months were available in 5 studies; all-cause mortality and stroke were similar between groups, although major or life-threatening bleeding was more frequent with DAPT. In conclusion, in patients undergoing TAVI, DAPT is associated with increased risk at 30 days of all-cause mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding, and major vascular complications without a decrease in ischemic complications; at 6 months, the excess bleeding risk persisted. These data suggest a safety concern with DAPT and justify further investigation of the optimal antiplatelet therapy regimen after TAVI.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Aims To investigate the role of endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) with endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) in acute severe obstructive cholangitis management by performing a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Method We searched PubMed and Embase for controlled studies that compared endoscopic drainage with ES versus Non-ES in acute obstructive cholangitis. Two reviewers selected the studies and extracted the data. Disagreement was addressed by a third reviewer. Heterogeneity of the studies was analyzed by Cochran's Q statistics. A Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio was calculated utilizing a random effects model. Results Four controlled studies met our inclusion criteria with 392 participants (201 ES, 191 Non-ES). The outcomes were drainage insertion success rate, drainage effectiveness, post drainage pancreatitis, bleeding, procedure duration, perforation, cholecystitis, and 30-day mortality. Drainage insertion success rate was identical in both groups (RR: 1.00, 95 %CI% 0.96 - 1.04). Effective drainage was not significantly different (RR: 1.11, 95 %CI 0.73 - 1.7). There was no significant difference in the incidence of pancreatitis post EBD between the ES and Non-ES groups at 3 % and 4 %, respectively (RR: 0.73, 95 %CI 0.24 - 2.27). However, there was a significant increase in post EBD bleeding with ES compared to Non-ES (RR: 8.58, 95 %CI 2.03 - 36.34). Thirty-day mortality was similar between ES and Non-ES groups at 0.7 % and 1 %, respectively (RR: 0.5, 95 %CI 0.05 - 5.28). Conclusion Our findings show that EBD without ES is an effective drainage technique and carries less risk for post procedure bleeding. Patients who are critically ill and have coagulopathy should be spared from undergoing ES in the acute phase.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: Treatment of ischaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) remains controversial. While IMR is associated with worse outcomes, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies provided conflicting evidence regarding the benefit of mitral valve replacement (MVR) or repair (MVr) in addition to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We conducted a meta-analysis incorporating data from published RCTs and observational studies comparing CABG vs. CABG + MVR/MVr. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane for RCTs and observational studies comparing CABG (Group 1) vs. CABG + MVR/MVr (Group 2). Outcome was 30-day and 1-year mortality after surgical intervention. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) was calculated using random-effects meta-analysis for the outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. Four RCTs and 11 observational studies met the inclusion criteria (5781 patients, 507 in RCTs, 5274 in observational studies). Group 1 vs. 2 weighted mean left ventricular ejection fraction in RCTs and combined RCTs/observational studies was 41.5 ± 12.3 vs. 40.3 ± 10.4% ( P -value = 0.24) and 45.5 ± 7.2 vs. 38 ± 10% ( P -value < 0.001), respectively. In RCTs, there was no difference in 30-day [OR: 0.95, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.30-3.08, P = 0.94] or 1-year (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.43-1.87, P = 0.78) mortality, respectively. For combined RCTs/observational studies, there was no difference in mortality at 30 days (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.43-1.04, P = 0.08) or at 1 year (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.7-1.15, P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: In a meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies of IMR patients, the addition of MVR/MVr to CABG did not improve survival.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) is not superior to rate control in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), but AF ablation may be more successful at achieving rhythm control than AADs. However, risks for both ablation and AADs are likely higher and success rates lower in patients with HF. OBJECTIVE: To compare rate control versus AF catheter ablation strategies in patients with AF and HF. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of trials which randomized HF patients (LVEF<50%) with AF to a rate control or AF catheter ablation strategy and reported change in LVEF, quality of life, 6-minute walk test, or peak oxygen consumption. Study quality and heterogenity were assessed using Jadad scores and Cochran's Q statistics, respectively. Mantel Haenszel relative risks and mean differences were calculated using random effect models. RESULTS: Four trials (N=224) met inclusion criteria; 82.5% (n=185) had persistent AF. AF ablation was associated with an increase in LVEF (mean difference 8.5%; 95%CI 6.4,10.7%; P<0.001) compared to rate control. AF ablation was superior in improving quality of life by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire scores (mean difference -11.9; 95%CI -17.1, -6.6; P<0.001). Peak oxygen consumption and 6-minute walk distance increased in AF ablation compared to rate control patients (mean difference 3.2; 95%CI 1.1,5.2; P=0.003; mean difference 34.8; 95%CI 2.9, 66.7; P = 0.03, respectively). In the persistent AF subgroup LVEF and MLWHF were significantly improved with AF ablation. Major adverse event rates (RR 1.3; 95% CI, 0.4, 3.9; p=0.64) were not significantly different. No significant heterogeneity was evident. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF and AF, AF catheter ablation is superior to rate control in improving LVEF, quality of life and functional capacity. Prior to accepting a rate control strategy in HF patients with persistent or drug refractory AF, consideration should be given to AF ablation.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Among patients who have received liver transplants, infections increase morbidity and mortality and prolong hospital stays. Administration of antibiotics and surgical trauma create intestinal barrier dysfunction and microbial imbalances that allow enteric bacteria to translocate to the blood. Probiotics are believed to prevent bacterial translocation by stabilizing the intestinal barrier and stimulating proliferation of the intestinal epithelium, mucus secretion, and motility. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the effects of probiotics on infections in patients receiving liver transplants. METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE for controlled trials that evaluated the effects of prebiotics and probiotics on infections in patients who underwent liver transplantation. Heterogeneity was analyzed by the Cochran Q statistic. Pooled Mantel-Haenszel relative risks were calculated with a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 4 controlled studies, comprising 246 participants (123 received probiotics, 123 served as controls), for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In these studies, the intervention groups received enteric nutrition and fiber (prebiotics) with probiotics, and the control groups received only enteric nutrition and fiber without probiotics. The infection rate was 7% in groups that received probiotics vs 35% in control groups (relative risk [RR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.41; P = .001). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 infection was 3.6. In subgroup analyses, only 2% of subjects in the probiotic groups developed urinary tract infections, compared with 16% of controls (RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.47; P < .001); only 2% of subjects in the probiotic groups developed intra-abdominal infections, compared with 11% of controls (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09-0.78; P = .02). Subjects receiving probiotics also had shorter stays in the hospital than controls (mean difference, 1.41 d; P < .001), as well as in the intensive care unit (mean difference, 1.41 d; P < .001), and duration of antibiotic use (mean difference, 3.89 d; P < .001). There was no difference in mortality between groups (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.21-4.47). There was no significant heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the meta-analysis, giving patients a combination of probiotics and prebiotics before, or on the day of, liver transplantation reduces the rate of infection after surgery. These agents also reduced the amount of time spent in the hospital or intensive care unit and the duration of antibiotic use.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malignant biliary obstruction frequently portends a poor prognosis. Palliative treatment with stenting is often required to alleviate symptoms and potentially prevent adverse events. OBJECTIVES: The aims of our study were (1) to evaluate the clinical difference between self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) and plastic stents (PSs) in both hilar and distal malignant biliary obstruction on occlusion rate and 30-day mortality rate (primary outcomes) and stent insertion success rate, therapeutic failure, reintervention rate, and adverse events (secondary outcomes); (2) to compare unilateral stenting with bilateral stenting in hilar malignant obstruction in terms of occlusion rate and 30-day mortality rate (primary outcomes) and insertion success rate, therapeutic failure, and adverse events (secondary outcomes). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies that provided data about malignant biliary obstruction and stent therapy. We included randomized, controlled trials (RCT), prospective observational cohort, and retrospective case-control studies. The quality of each included RCT study was assessed by the Jadad scale. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences were calculated by using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Nineteen studies involving 1989 patients (1045 SEMSs and 944 PSs) were included for the comparison of SEMSs and PSs. We also included 7 studies that compared unilateral with bilateral stenting involving 634 patients (346 unilateral and 268 bilateral). Our meta-analysis confirmed that SEMSs are associated with a statistically significant lower risk of occlusion compared with PSs in the short term (OR 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.60) and long term (OR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.28-0.53). SEMSs had a lower 30-day occlusion rate than PSs in both hilar malignant obstruction (OR 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.62) and distal malignant obstruction (OR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.93). SEMSs had a lower long-term occlusion rate compared with PSs in hilar malignant obstruction (OR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.39) and distal malignant obstruction (OR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.64). The 30-day mortality rate was similar with SEMSs and PSs (OR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.47-1.17). Therapeutic failure was more likely when using PSs (13%) compared with SEMSs (7%) (OR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.67). SEMSs required fewer reinterventions compared with PSs (mean difference, -0.49; 95% CI, -0.8 to -0.19). The incidence of cholangitis was statistically lower with SEMSs (8% vs 21%) (OR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76). Bilateral stenting for hilar obstruction was not associated with a lower obstruction rate than unilateral stenting (OR 1.49; 95% CI, 0.77-2.89) or a lower 30-day mortality rate (OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.29-1.79). There was no statistical difference in therapeutic failure (OR 1.47; 95% CI, 0.77-2.89) or cholangitis incidence (OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.27-1.38). CONCLUSION: SEMSs are associated with a statistically significantly lower occlusion rate, less therapeutic failure, less need for reintervention, and lower cholangitis incidence. There was no statistically significant difference in occlusion rate, therapeutic failure, and cholangitis incidence with bilateral stenting. Guideline recommendations may need to be modified to reflect clear and compelling data demonstrating the benefit of SEMSs in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Bilateral stenting should be avoided because it has no benefit over unilateral stenting in terms of occlusion rate or therapeutic failure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cardiac tumors may be symptomatic or found incidentally during evaluation for a seemingly unrelated problem or physical finding. Because symptoms may mimic other cardiac conditions, the clinical challenge is to consider the possibility of a cardiac tumor so that the appropriate diagnostic test(s) can be conducted. In this case, we describe an exceedingly rare cardiac tumor.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: The objective of this study was to determine the factors independently associated with septal curvature in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive patients with PAH who had an echocardiogram and a right heart catheterization within 24 hours of each others were included in the study. Septal curvature was assessed at the mid-papillary level using the eccentricity index (EI). Marked early systolic septal anterior motion was defined as a change in EI > 0.2 between end-diastole and early systole. Inter-ventricular mechanical delay was calculated as the percent time difference between right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) end-ejection time normalized for the RR interval. RESULTS: Average age was 45 ± 11 years and the majority of patients were women (75%). Mean right atrial pressure was 11 ± 7 mmHg, mean PAP was 52 ± 13 mmHg, relative RV area 1.8 ± 0.9, and RV fractional area change 24 ± 8%. End-diastolic EI was 1.6 ± 0.4 and systolic EI was 2.5 ± 0.8. On multivariate analysis relative pulmonary pressure, relative RV area, and inter-ventricular mechanical delay were independently associated with systolic EI (R(2) = 0.72, P < 0.001). Independent determinants of diastolic EI included relative RV area and mean PAP (R(2) = 0.69, P < 0.001). A systolic EI >1.08 differentiated patients with PAH from healthy controls with an AUC = 0.99. Patients with early systolic septal anterior motion (44% of subjects) had lower exercise capacity, more extensive ventricular remodeling, and worst ventricular function. CONCLUSION: Septal curvature is a useful marker of structural, hemodynamic, and electromechanical ventricular interdependence in PAH.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)