RESUMEN

This practice guideline was developed by the chronic kidney disease (CKD) Task Force, which was composed of clinical and methodological experts. The Saudi Arabian Ministry of Health and its health holding company commissioned this guideline project to support the realization of Vision 2030's health-care transformation pillar. The synthesis of these guidelines was guided by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)- ADOLOPMENT methodology. The final guidelines addressed 12 clinical questions on the management of blood pressure in patients with CKD through a set of recommen-dations and performance measures. The recom-mendations included antihypertensive agents in children; renin- angiotensin system inhibition (RASi) versus non-RASi in adults; intensive versus standard blood pressure targets; early versus late assessment for kidney replacement therapy (KRT); late versus early preparation strategies for KRT; CKD symptoms during assessment for KRT or conservative manage-ment; initiation of KRT in patients with deteriorating CKD; choice of KRT modality or conservative management in certain CKD patient groups; changing or discontinuing KRT modalities; the frequency of reviews for KRT or conservative management; and information, education, and support. These conditional recommendations were based on a low to very low certainty of evidence, which highlights the need for high-quality randomized trials com-paring different antihypertensive agents in patients with CKD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Many studies have provided evidence for an increased risk of atrial fibrillation among diabetic patients as compared to the nondiabetic population. It is also well known that diabetes predisposes a person to an increased risk of diabetic nephropathy. A few reviews and studies have hinted towards an increased risk of atrial fibrillation among diabetic nephropathy patients; however, there is no concrete evidence at present. Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis to explore if there is an association between diabetic nephropathy and atrial fibrillation. Methods: The available literature was searched for relevant studies from the period of January 1995 to November 2020. The following quality assessment criteria were considered for study shortlisting: clearly defined comparison groups, same outcome measured in both comparison groups, known confounders addressed, and a sufficiently long and complete (more than 80%) follow-up of patients. Two independent reviewers searched the databases, formed their search strategies, and finalized the studies. The data were analyzed to obtain a summary odds ratio along with a forest plot by Cochrane's RevMan 5.3. Results: Only four studies were found to meet the inclusion criterion for this meta-analysis (total number of study participants: 307330, diabetic nephropathy patients: 22855). Of these, two were retrospective cross-sectional studies, one was a prospective cohort study, and one was a case-control study. Three studies had provided the odds ratio as the measure of effect (two retrospective cross-sectional studies and one case-control study), with the one cohort study reporting the hazards ratio as the measure of effect. Therefore, the meta-analysis was done excluding the cohort study. The summary odds ratio in the present study was 1.32 (0.80-2.18), which was not statistically significant. Due to large heterogeneity among the included studies and their small sample sizes, it was found that the summary estimate shifted towards the null value. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis found no significant association between atrial fibrillation and diabetic nephropathy. However, more studies with large sample sizes are required to strengthen the evidence for an association.

RESUMEN

Hypoglycemia is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), more so if they have diabetes as well. The occurrence of hypoglycemia in CKD is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, both of which are treatable and preventable. This review summarizes the incidence and risk factors associated with hypoglycemia among patients with CKD. The meta-analysis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A search was done on PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature for cohort studies in English published between January 2000 and August 2019 using search terms related to hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), chronic kidney disease (chronic renal failure OR renal failure), and incidence (risk OR epidemiology OR risk factors). Summary measures were calculated using random-effects model. A total of 5 studies involving 311,817 persons were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of hypoglycemia in patients with CKD was 0.188 (confidence interval [CI] = 0.097-0.287). The incidence of hypoglycemia was significantly higher in patients with CKD than in patients without CKD (Relative risk [RR] = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.86-1.92, P < 0.0001). No heterogeneity was reported between the studies (I2 = 0%, P > 0.05), and publication bias was also found. Females, patients who had diabetes mellitus of long duration, and those on antidiabetic drugs such as insulin and sulfonylureas were at risk of developing hypoglycemia in CKD as per narrative review. The incidence of hypoglycemia in patients with CKD is high. Therefore, there is need to closely monitor affected individuals so that appropriate management protocols could be set up. Further probing of various risk factors for hypoglycemia in CKD patients is necessary for early detection and initiation of timely preventive and curative measures.

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Uncontrolled hypertension is a main predisposing risk factor leading to chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). Although several treatment methods for patients with HTN and AF were developed in past decades, further investigations of their efficacies are needed. This systematic narrative review presents an overview of studies reporting treatment efficacies in patients with HTN and/or AF. METHODS: A narrative-based systematic review was performed using EMBASE, Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library searching for relevant papers published between October 2008 and October 2018. Out of 4481 studies, only 15 studies could be included following the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Included studies reported treatment measures, measured outcomes, and efficacies in adult patients with HTN and AF with defined interventions and methodologies. Treatment methods with effective outcomes were administration of hydrochlorothiazide, losartan or atenolol, telmisartan or amlodipine, or general anti-hypertensive drugs. Treatment methods that showed the most effective outcomes (lowering AF recurrence and improving BP control) were those containing pulmonary vein (or antrum) isolation (PVI/PVAI) (6 studies) and/or in conjunction with renal denervation (RDN)(6 studies). Treatment methods showing the most effective outcomes were PVI/PVAI in conjunction with RDN. CONCLUSION: The latest evidence shows that PVI (in conjunction with RDN in some instances) was more efficacious among patients suffering from HTN and/or AF.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of donor hypertension on the blood pressure of renal transplant recipients and the allograft outcomes are unclear. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence about the effects of donor hypertension on renal transplant recipients' blood pressure, renal allograft outcomes and mortality. METHODS: Studies published from January 1960 to 31 January 2019 in English were identified through a systematic search of six databases; PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL. Eligible observational studies with at least 1 year of follow-up were selected. Pooled estimates were obtained using random effects model. RESULTS: We identified 15 papers from eight countries containing data on donor hypertension and renal transplantation carried out between 1963 and 2014. The median (range) follow-up period of the studies was 3.8 (1-11.9) years. The prevalence of post-transplant hypertension among recipients of a renal allograft from a normotensive donor range from 8 to 17.6%, while the prevalence of post-transplant hypertension among recipients of a renal allograft from a hypertensive donor range from 2.9 to 25%. Overall, pooled risk ratios (RR) indicated that donor hypertension was a risk factor for allograft failure or loss among renal transplant recipients (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.06-1.63: P = 0.014). However, donor hypertension was not a risk factor for mortality among renal transplant recipients (RR 0.996; 95% CI 0.652-1.519: P = 0.984). CONCLUSIONS: Donor hypertension increases the risk of post-transplant hypertension among renal transplant recipients and increases the risk of allograft failure, However, donor hypertension was not a risk factor for mortality among renal transplant recipients, Closer monitoring should be given to renal allograft recipients from hypertensive donors, and further well-designed studies are needed to expand our knowledge of the impact of donor hypertension on the survival of renal allograft recipients.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Research activity represents an important process conducted to address an issue in a precise and systematic manner. Data of this kind regarding the methodological difficulties encountered by healthcare practitioners in conducting clinical research in Saudi Arabia are scarce. This study aims to assess the methodological difficulties encountered by healthcare practitioners in conducting clinical research in Saudi Arabia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare practitioners who conducted or who were involved in research in Saudi Arabia from June 2018 through August 2018. Data were collected through SurveyMonkey, using a modified version of a questionnaire from a previous similar study. RESULTS: Overall, 236 respondents participated in the study, more than half, that is, 131 (55.50%) had conducted research as principal investigators, 41 (17.40%) had never attended a research workshop, and 57 (24.20%) were members of research committees. Respondents identified "formulating the research title" and "cooperation between research partners" as the easiest research steps by 58 (24.58%) for each. "Receiving funds and financial resources to complete the research project" ranked the highest difficult step by 124 (52.54%) of the respondents. Attending >2 clinical research workshops was significantly associated with lower methodological difficulty scores. Specifically, those who attended scored 35.28 ± 12.86, while those who did not scored 42.34 ± 12.64, with a highly statistically significant difference (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings show that securing funding and finding an available biostatistician contributed greatly to the methodological difficulties of conducting clinical research. The difficulty score decreased significantly with increasing the number of clinical research workshops attended by the researchers.