RESUMEN

One Health Surveillance (OHS) implements the One Health approach to improving health by collecting data and producing information to support integrated action across the animal health, human health and environment sectors. The purpose of this study was to survey the biosurveillance community to assess its OHS practices and capabilities, its attitudes towards OHS (perceived value), and the factors that motivate its members to implement OHS practices. The authors used a convenience sample of 185 professionals from multiple domains and 44 nations. They examined the extent to which these professionals implemented OHS, gathered their opinions on the value of OHS, assessed their perceptions of the capacity to perform specific OHS tasks and identified their priorities for change. Over 85% of all respondents said that they considered OHS to be beneficial, with no significant differences between work domains or country income groups; over 50% indicated that they already applied OHS. Obtaining access to data collected by other domains was both the most frequent challenge and the most difficult to improve. The highest priority for improvement was having the ability to send and receive electronic data. Respondents from low-income or middle-income countries were more motivated to make improvements than stakeholders from high-income countries. These findings provide a snapshot of current opinions and practices and, together with suggestions for improvements from professionals in the field, can help to target priority needs for OHS information, training and resources.

La surveillance Une seule santé opérationnalise la méthode Une seule santé pour une meilleure santé à travers la collecte de données et la production d'informations visant à soutenir la mobilisation transversale des secteurs de la santé animale, de la santé publique et de la santé environnementale en vue d'une action intégrée. Les auteurs présentent les résultats d'une enquête menée auprès des professionnels en charge de la biosurveillance afin d'évaluer leurs pratiques et capacités en matière de surveillance Une seule santé, leurs attitudes à l'égard de cette surveillance (c'est-à-dire leur perception de l'intérêt de la démarche) et les facteurs susceptibles de les motiver à la mettre en oeuvre. Les auteurs ont procédé à un échantillonnage de commodité de 185 intervenants issus de plusieurs secteurs dans 44 pays. Ils ont ensuite analysé le niveau de mise en oeuvre de la surveillance Une seule santé chez ces intervenants, recueilli leurs opinions concernant l'intérêt de la démarche, évalué la perception qu'ils avaient de leur capacité à mener à bien certaine tâches spécifiques dans ce domaine et identifié leurs priorités en vue du changement. Plus de 85 % des répondants ont déclaré considérer la surveillance Une seule santé comme étant bénéfique, résultat ne présentant pas de corrélation significative avec le secteur professionnel des personnes interrogées ni avec le niveau de revenu de leur pays ; plus de 50 % des répondants ont par ailleurs indiqué qu'ils appliquaient déjà les principes d'une surveillance Une seule santé. La difficulté la plus fréquente et qui paraissait la plus difficile à résoudre était celle de pouvoir accéder aux données enregistrées par d'autres secteurs. La première des priorités identifiées en vue d'une amélioration concernait la capacité d'envoyer et de recevoir des données électroniques. La motivation à introduire des améliorations était plus forte chez les répondants des pays à revenu faible ou intermédiaire que chez les parties prenantes des pays à revenus élevés. Ces résultats, qui offrent un instantané des opinions et des pratiques actuelles assorti de propositions concrètes d'amélioration formulées par les professionnels de terrain devraient pouvoir contribuer à cibler les besoins prioritaires en matière d'information, de formation et de ressources dédiées à la surveillance Une seule santé.

Practicar la vigilancia en clave de Una sola salud significa traducir esta idea en la práctica con el fin de mejorar la salud reuniendo datos y generando información a partir de la cual actuar de forma integrada en los sectores de la sanidad animal, la salud humana y el medio ambiente. Los autores describen un estudio de los círculos dedicados a la vigilancia biológica que tenía por objetivo evaluar sus procedimientos y capacidades de vigilancia en clave de Una sola salud, sus actitudes al respecto (valor atribuido) y los factores que los motivan a instaurar procedimientos concebidos desde la lógica de Una sola salud. Para ello los autores utilizaron una muestra de conveniencia de 185 profesionales de múltiples disciplinas y 44 países. Tras determinar en qué medida esos profesionales practicaban la vigilancia en clave de Una sola salud, les pidieron su opinión sobre la utilidad de este tipo de vigilancia, evaluaron la capacidad que subjetivamente se atribuían de efectuar labores específicas de vigilancia en clave de Una sola salud y determinaron aquellos cambios que esas personas juzgaban prioritarios. Más de un 85% de los encuestados dijo considerar beneficiosa la vigilancia en clave de Una sola salud, sin que se observaran diferencias significativas por ámbito de trabajo o por países según el grupo de ingresos. Más de un 50% afirmó que ya aplicaba este tipo de vigilancia. El problema señalado con más frecuencia y juzgado a la vez más difícil de resolver era el del acceso a datos obtenidos desde otros ámbitos de trabajo. El aspecto que más urgía mejorar era el de la capacidad de enviar y recibir datos electrónicos. Los encuestados de países de nivel bajo o medio de ingresos mostraban mayor motivación a la hora de introducir mejoras que sus homólogos de países de ingresos altos. Estas conclusiones, que ofrecen una «instantánea¼ de las opiniones y prácticas imperantes, pueden ayudar, junto con las propuestas de mejora procedentes de esos profesionales que trabajan sobre el terreno, a seleccionar las necesidades prioritarias de información, formación y recursos para la práctica de la vigilancia en clave de Una sola salud.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A critical question surrounding emergence of novel strains of avian influenza viruses (AIV) is the ability for wild migratory birds to translocate a complete (unreassorted whole genome) AIV intercontinentally. Virus translocation via migratory birds is suspected in outbreaks of highly pathogenic strain A(H5N1) in Asia, Africa and Europe. As a result, the potential intercontinental translocation of newly emerging AIV such as A(H7N9) from Eurasia to North America via migratory movements of birds remains a concern. An estimated 2.91 million aquatic birds move annually between Eurasia and North America with an estimated AIV prevalence as high as 32.2%. Here, we present a rapid assessment to address the likelihood of whole (unreassorted)-genome translocation of Eurasian strain AIV into North America. The scope of this assessment was limited specifically to assess the weight of evidence to support the movement of an unreassorted AIV intercontinentally by migratory aquatic birds. We developed a rapid assessment framework to assess the potential for intercontinental movement of avian influenzas by aquatic birds. This framework was iteratively reviewed by a multidisciplinary panel of scientific experts until a consensus was established. Our assessment framework identified four factors that may contribute to the potential for introduction of any AIV intercontinentally into North America by wild aquatic birds. These factors, in aggregate, provide a framework for evaluating the likelihood of new forms of AIV from Eurasia to be introduced by aquatic birds into North America. Based on our assessment, we determined that the potential for introduction of A(H7N9) into North America through aquatic migratory birds is possible, but the likelihood ranges from extremely low to low.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Improved understanding and assessment of the complex factors associated with disease emergence and spread will lead to better management and thus reduction of risk for disease occurrence. Specific biological, ecologic, environmental, and societal factors have been identified that precede emerging infections. Based on these factors, a qualitative tool was developed to assess risk for disease emergence and spread. Within this tool, three separate assessment elements were developed: novel disease evolution, pathways by which a disease agent could be introduced into a country, and domestic spread from the location of introduction or evolution. Risk factors identified for each of the three elements consist of specific descriptions of production practices, consumer demand, trade, health conditions, and environmental conditions, and are categorized as primary or secondary. Using this tool, those factors contributing greatest to risk of disease emergence can be identified and targeted for mitigation. In addition, risk can be monitored over time, focusing on factors that are primary or that have the greatest potential for increasing disease emergence risk.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: To form a database of videokeratography patterns and quantitative indices describing normal human corneas using the absolute scale. METHODS: Both eyes of 195 normal subjects were examined with a TMS-1 videokeratoscope. Videokeratographs were divided into 10 categories based on a classification scheme devised from the absolute scale and analysed with 10 quantitative indices devised to describe phenotypic features of keratoconus videokeratographs. Correlations were sought between videokeratograph patterns and quantitative indices. Additionally, data were analysed for differences in age, sex, and ethnicity. RESULTS: For symmetric videokeratography patterns, analysis in the absolute scale was similar to a previous study done in the normalised scale. In the asymmetric categories, analyses differed markedly. Using the absolute scale and our classification scheme more variation in normal videokeratography patterns could be appreciated. There was good correlation between quantitative indices and videokeratography patterns. Neither videokeratography patterns nor indices differed significantly between sex, ethnic groups, or age using two way analysis of variance. CONCLUSIONS: Pattern analysis of videokeratographs in the absolute scale using, a standard classification scheme, may be more useful in trying to determine whether a cornea is normal or represents subtle early disease than analysis in the normalised scale. Quantitative indices could remove the subjectivity from the decision making process thus facilitating universal reproducibility of videokeratography data interpretation.

Asunto(s)