Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Klin Padiatr ; 234(2): 119-122, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35255503

RESUMEN

AIM: We aimed to report a severe and rare pediatric rhabdomyolysis case associated with a dual viral infection. CASE: A 13 year-old, healthy girl presented with the complaints of fever, abdominal pain, weakness and dark-colored urine. She was diagnosed with rhabdomyolysis based on clinical signs and laboratory findings. The diagnosis was confirmed by serological tests and real-time polymerase chain reaction for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV), respectively. Other potential genetic, metabolic and infectious causes were evaluated meticulously but no evidence was found. This case is also important as it is the first reported case to our knowledge on rhabdomyolysis associated with EBV and CMV co-infection in children. CONCLUSION: The presented case experienced tetraplegia due to the severe muscular damage and muscle power returned to normal range after 3 months. This suggests that EBV and CMV may have exert synergistic effects leading to more severe inflammation and degeneration.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr , Rabdomiólisis , Adolescente , Citomegalovirus , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/diagnóstico , Femenino , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Humanos , Rabdomiólisis/complicaciones , Rabdomiólisis/diagnóstico , Rabdomiólisis/terapia
2.
Int Ophthalmol ; 42(6): 1897-1904, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35088360

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Childhood blindness is important cause contributing to the burden of blindness. It is necessary to identify the most frequently observed diseases in different populations. We aimed to demonstrate clinical features of low vision children and to evaluate the factors affecting visual function by a new visual function scoring system. METHODS: Two hundred forty nine children between the age of 6 months and 3 years were included. Visual function was scored from 0 to 15 according to; response to threat, light, object, presence of fixation, duration of fixation, following of light and object in horizontal, vertical, oblique, and circular gazes, optokinetic nystagmus. Patients were classified according to neurological diagnosis and cranial magnetic resonance imaging findings. Correlation between visual function score and ocular and neurologic findings were evaluated. RESULTS: While 136 patients (54.6%) had cerebral visual impairment (CVI), 89 (35.7%) had ocular pathology, 24 patients (9.6%) had combined pathology. The most common ocular and cerebral pathologies were oculocutaneous albinism (23.9%) and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) (27.5%), respectively. Patients with CVI had lower visual function than ocular pathologies. Neurological structural disorders and HIE had worse visual function. Widespread involvement of brain had lower visual function score. Seizure negatively affected visual function. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral causes were found in approximately half of infants and children with low vision who were referred to our center for visual habilitation. The visual function scoring system we developed in this study will provide an opportunity to be objective in the follow-up of babies and in evaluating the effectiveness of visual habilitation programs.


Asunto(s)
Encefalopatías , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso , Baja Visión , Ceguera , Encefalopatías/complicaciones , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Visión/etiología , Baja Visión/diagnóstico , Agudeza Visual
3.
Epilepsy Behav ; 116: 107745, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33508749

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Levetiracetam (LEV) is a second-generation antiepileptic drug with high efficacy and tolerability in children and adults with epilepsy. We aimed to retrospectively assess the long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of LEV monotherapy in children with epilepsy. METHODS: All patients who received LEV monotherapy at the Ankara University Children Hospital between January 2010 and June 2020 were evaluated. This retrospective pediatric cohort study determined the efficacy and safety of LEV monotherapy in 281 outpatients with epilepsy. RESULTS: There were 281 patients, 50.5% female, aged 5 months to 18 years with a mean age of 9 years. Of these, 48% of patients had idiopathic epilepsy, 40.6% had symptomatic epilepsy, and 11,4% had cryptogenic/genetic epilepsy. Primary generalized seizures occurred in 61.6% of patients, focal seizures in 19.6%, both generalized and focal seizures in 15,3%, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures in 2.5%, and undefined type of seizure in 1.1%. A total of 22.8% patients had an accompanying extra neurological disease, mostly cardiological and hematological. The range of final daily dose was 10-71 mg/kg/day, with mean 29.5 mg/kg/day. Duration of therapy ranged from 7 days to 96 months, with median 12 months (IQR: 6-22). For the all cohort, a 6th month retention rate was 81%, a 12th month retention rate was 71.4%, and a 24th month retention rate was 61.8%. Eighty five percent of the patients had a seizure reduction of at least 50% and 55.9% of patients remained seizure-free for median 12 months treatment duration with LEV monotherapy. Improvement of electroencephalography (EEG) findings was found in 42% of patients on control EEGs. A total of 67 adverse events were documented in 45 (16%) patients. The most common adverse events were behavioral problems such as aggression (n:18) and irritability (n:17). The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 2.5%, and due to inefficacy was 5.3%. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that the high retention rates, high percentage of seizure reduction, the low discontinuation rate due to adverse events and inefficacy, and the relatively benign and transient profile of adverse events make LEV preferable as monotherapy in the pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Neurología , Piracetam , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Piracetam/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA