RESUMEN
How postural responses change with sensory perturbations while also performing a cognitive task is still debatable. This study investigated this question via comprehensive assessment of postural sway, head kinematics and their coupling. Twenty-three healthy young adults stood in tandem with eyes open or wearing the HTC Vive Head-Mounted Display (HMD) with a static or dynamic (i.e., movement in the anterior-posterior direction at 5 mm or 32 mm at 0.2 Hz) 3-wall stars display. On half of the trials, participants performed a cognitive serial subtraction task. Medio-lateral center-of-pressure (COP) path significantly increased with the cognitive task, particularly with dynamic visuals whereas medio-lateral variance decreased with the cognitive task. Head path and velocity significantly increased with the cognitive task in both directions while variance decreased. Head-COP cross-correlations ranged between 0.78 and 0.66. These findings, accompanied by frequency analysis, suggest that postural control switched to primarily relying on somatosensory input under challenging cognitive load conditions. Several differences between head and COP suggest that head kinematics contribute an important additional facet of postural control and the relationship between head and COP may depend on task and stance position. The potential of HMDs for clinical assessments of balance needs to be further explored.
Asunto(s)
Movimiento , Equilibrio Postural , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Cognición , Humanos , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a condition characterized by chronic subjective dizziness and exacerbated by visual stimuli or upright movement. Typical balance tests do not replicate the environments known to increase symptoms in people with PPPD-crowded places with moving objects. Using a virtual reality system, we quantified dynamic balance in people with PPPD and healthy controls in diverse visual conditions. METHODS: Twenty-two individuals with PPPD and 29 controls performed a square-shaped fast walking task (Four-Square Step Test Virtual Reality-FSST-VR) using a head-mounted-display (HTC Vive) under 3 visual conditions (empty train platform; people moving; people and trains moving). Head kinematics was used to measure task duration, movement smoothness and anterior-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) ranges of movement (ROM). Heart rate (HR) was monitored using a chest-band. Participants also completed a functional mobility test (Timed-Up-and-Go; TUG) and questionnaires measuring anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; STAI), balance confidence (Activities-Specific Balance Confidence; ABC), perceived disability (Dizziness Handicap Inventory) and simulator sickness (Simulator Sickness Questionnaire). Main effects of visual load and group and associations between performance, functional and self-reported outcomes were examined. RESULTS: State anxiety and simulator sickness did not increase following testing. AP-ROM and HR increased with high visual load in both groups (p < 0.05). There were no significant between-group differences in head kinematics. In the high visual load conditions, high trait anxiety and longer TUG duration were moderately associated with reduced AP and ML-ROM in the PPPD group and low ABC and high perceived disability were associated with reduced AP-ROM (|r| = 0.47 to 0.53; p < 0.05). In contrast, in controls high STAI-trait, low ABC and longer TUG duration were associated with increased AP-ROM (|r| = 0.38 to 0.46; p < 0.05) and longer TUG duration was associated with increased ML-ROM (r = 0.53, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: FSST-VR may shed light on movement strategies in PPPD beyond task duration. While no main effect of group was observed, the distinct associations with self-reported and functional outcomes, identified using spatial head kinematics, suggest that some people with PPPD reduce head degrees of freedom when performing a dynamic balance task. This supports a potential link between spatial perception and PPPD symptomatology.
Asunto(s)
Mareo/fisiopatología , Percepción , Equilibrio Postural , Adulto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Estudios Transversales , Mareo/diagnóstico , Mareo/psicología , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Masculino , Movimiento , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Realidad Virtual , Caminata , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People with PPPD report imbalance, increase in symptoms and impaired function within complex visual environments, but understanding of the mechanism for these behaviors is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate postural control in PPPD we compared changes in center of pressure (COP) and head kinematics of people with PPPD (Nâ=â22) and healthy controls (Nâ=â20) in response to different combinations of visual and cognitive perturbations during a challenging balance task. METHODS: Participants stood in a tandem position. Static or moving stars (0.2âHz, 5âmm or 32âmm amplitude, anterior-posterior direction) were displayed through a head-mounted display (HTC Vive). On half the trials, participants performed a serial-3 subtraction task. We measured medio-lateral and anterior-posterior path and acceleration of COP and head. RESULTS: Controls significantly increased all COP and head parameters with the cognitive task whereas PPPD increased only COP ML path and acceleration. Only controls significantly increased head anterior-posterior & medio-lateral acceleration with moving visual load. Cognitive task performance was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We observed altered postural strategies in people with PPPD, in the form of reduced movement with challenge, particularly around the head segment. The potential of this simple and portable head-mounted display setup for differential diagnosis of vestibular disorders should be further explored.