RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: COVID-19 patients present a high hospitalization rate with a high mortality risk for those requiring intensive care. When these patients have other comorbid conditions and older age, the risk for severe disease and poor outcomes after ICU admission are increased. The present work aims to describe the preliminary results of the ongoing NUTRICOVID study about the nutritional and functional status and the quality of life of adult COVID-19 survivors after ICU discharge, emphasizing the in-hospital and discharge situation of this population. METHODS: A multicenter, ambispective, observational cohort study was conducted in 16 public hospitals of the Community of Madrid with COVID-19 survivors who were admitted to the ICU during the first outbreak. Preliminary results of this study include data retrospectively collected. Malnutrition and sarcopenia were screened at discharge using MUST and SARC-F; the use of healthcare resources was measured as the length of hospital stay and requirement of respiratory support and tracheostomy during hospitalization; other study variables were the need for medical nutrition therapy (MNT); and patients' functional status (Barthel index) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were included in this preliminary analysis. Most patients were male and older than 60 years, who suffered an average (SD) weight loss of 16.6% (8.3%) during the hospital stay, with a median length of stay of 53 (27-89.5) days and a median ICU stay of 24.5 (11-43.5) days. At discharge, 83.5% and 86.9% of the patients were at risk of malnutrition and sarcopenia, respectively, but only 38% were prescribed MNT. In addition, more than 70% of patients had significant impairment of their mobility and to conduct their usual activities at hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis evidences the high nutritional and functional impairment of COVID-19 survivors at hospital discharge and highlights the need for guidelines and systematic protocols, together with appropriate rehabilitation programs, to optimize the nutritional management of these patients after discharge.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Desnutrición , Sarcopenia , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Calidad de Vida , COVID-19/epidemiología , Sarcopenia/epidemiología , Estado Funcional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Hospitalización , Sobrevivientes , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Estado NutricionalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Lactate levels to guide resuscitation in critically burned patients are controversial. The purpose of our study was to determine whether absolute lactate values or lower lactate clearance predict mortality, and whether these are useful tools in the resuscitation phase. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, unicentric, observational study of a cohort of 214 burn patients admitted in the Burn Intensive Care Unit. We collected demographic and laboratory data, complications, absolute lactate levels and lactate clearance every 8 h since admission to 72 h. In critical patients we monitored hemodynamic parameters with transpulmonary thermodilution. We used Student's t-test or nonparametric tests, mixed models and Pearson and Spearman methods, Fisher's exact and chi-squared test. RESULTS: Of the 214 patients, 76.6% were male, mean age were 46 ± 15 years and 23.0 ± 19.5% of Total Basal Surface Area (TBSA) burned. Initial mean absolute levels of lactate were 2.02 ± 1.62 mmol/L in survivors vs. 4.05 ± 3.90 mmol/L in nonsurvivors. Initial elevated lactate levels increased mortality (p < .001), length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation and shock. In the subgroup of burned TBSA < 20%, lowering the lactate cut-off point from 2.0 to 1.8 mmol/L improved the mortality prediction (OR:9.3). We found no relationship between lactate clearance in the first 24 h and mortality. In more severe patients (> 20% TBSA burned and initial lactate levels > 2), a good correlation was found between lactate and cardiac index; but not with intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI). Patients with low ITBVI preload (< 600 mL/m2) did not show significant differences in lactate clearance compared with those with ITBVI > 600. CONCLUSIONS: Initial elevated lactate levels are a factor of poor prognosis and the cut-off point that best predicts mortality should be adjusted in the patients with TBSA burned < 20%. The global clearance of lactate in the first 24 h, unlike what occurs in other injuries, does not correlate with mortality. Monitoring lactate can ensure adequate peripheral perfusion during resuscitation with lower than normal fluid preload values.