RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that the meiotic spindle is not always aligned with the first polar body (PB) in metaphase II human oocytes. Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) has been used to observe and locate the meiotic spindle to avoid disrupting it while injecting oocytes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between meiotic spindle view and IVF-ICSI outcomes in poor responder women. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analytical study, carried out from January to November 2019; involving 115 poor responder women who underwent IVF-ICSI cycles at the Halim Fertility Center, Indonesia. The patients were divided into two groups: group I without meiotic spindle viewing (non-MSV) as control group, and group II with meiotic spindle viewing (MSV) as the case group. The meiotic spindles were imaged before ICSI with Oosight microscopy. Baseline characteristics and IVF-ICSI outcomes of both groups were compared. RESULTS: Our study included 115 poor responder women with non-MSV group (71 women), and an MSV group (44 women). The results showed that there was no significant difference in the fertilization rate between the two groups (p>0.05), but the embryo cleavage rate was higher in the MSV group when compared to the non-MSV group; and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). The fertilization rate was higher in aligned than misaligned spindle and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). Good quality embryo was higher in MSV group than non-MSV group (59.05% vs. 63.95%). CONCLUSIONS: Meiotic spindle view might improve the outcome of IVF in poor responder women.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Humanos , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Indonesia , Oocitos , Huso AcromáticoRESUMEN
Abstract Introduction There is only limited information from previous studies that suggest that auditory function may be influenced by hormones. Recent advances in the field have exposed the potential role of hormones in modulating the auditory system. Objective This study aims to investigate the relationship between menstrual cycle and outer hair cell function with audiological examination. Methods This is an analytic study with a cross-sectional design. The sampling was a systematic random sampling. We found 49 women with normal menstrual cycle and collected their data through interviews, physical examination, and examination of the ear, with otoscopic and other routine otorhinolaryngology examinations. We evaluated Tympanometry, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), and pure tone audiometry. Results We found the audiometric threshold worse in the follicular phase than other phases at 4000 Hz of the right ear, and in the ovulation was found best than any other phases at 1000 Hz of the left ear with significant difference. We found significant difference of DPOAE between ovulation time and follicular phase at 3000 Hz and 1000 Hz in the left ear and between ovulation and luteal phased at 2000 Hz, 3000 Hz and 5000 Hz in the right ear and at 1000 Hz in the left ear with p< 0.05. Conclusion The result of this study showed that only a small part of audiometry threshold had a significant difference between each menstrual phase. In other words, we found no correlation between menstrual and audiometry threshold. Nonetheless, there is a correlation between menstrual cycle phase and DPOAE amplitude.
RESUMEN
Introduction There is only limited information from previous studies that suggest that auditory function may be influenced by hormones. Recent advances in the field have exposed the potential role of hormones in modulating the auditory system. Objective This study aims to investigate the relationship between menstrual cycle and outer hair cell function with audiological examination. Methods This is an analytic study with a cross-sectional design. The sampling was a systematic random sampling. We found 49 women with normal menstrual cycle and collected their data through interviews, physical examination, and examination of the ear, with otoscopic and other routine otorhinolaryngology examinations. We evaluated Tympanometry, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), and pure tone audiometry. Results We found the audiometric threshold worse in the follicular phase than other phases at 4000 Hz of the right ear, and in the ovulation was found best than any other phases at 1000 Hz of the left ear with significant difference. We found significant difference of DPOAE between ovulation time and follicular phase at 3000 Hz and 1000 Hz in the left ear and between ovulation and luteal phased at 2000 Hz, 3000 Hz and 5000 Hz in the right ear and at 1000 Hz in the left ear with p < 0.05. Conclusion The result of this study showed that only a small part of audiometry threshold had a significant difference between each menstrual phase. In other words, we found no correlation between menstrual and audiometry threshold. Nonetheless, there is a correlation between menstrual cycle phase and DPOAE amplitude.