RESUMEN
This article focuses on the conceptions, attitudes and practices of the inhabitants from four villages (veredas) in Tierralta and Valencia (Cordoba, Colombia), who have suffered from or are aware of the existence of cutaneous leishmaniasis. A mixed methodology was implemented based in a qualitative design using interviews and focus groups (n=45) and an epidemiological design which included applying the Montenegro test (n=251), uncovering suspected cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in humans, (n=5) and applying epidemiological surveys (n=409). Among the results, a lack of knowledge regarding the vector was found; although respondents could identify the Lutzomyia (known as "alú"), they did not correlate it with cutaneous leishmaniasis. In addition, traditional home treatments were more frequently used, increasing the underrecording of cases. With respect to healthcare personnel, flaws in diagnosis and treatment were found, which reinforces adherence to home treatments. This scenario calls for a reflection upon the challenges of the health care system in relation to the interventions of health personnel in communities situated in endemic areas.
Asunto(s)
Características Culturales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Colombia/epidemiología , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/diagnóstico , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/psicología , Leishmaniasis Cutánea/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Investigación Cualitativa , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
RESUMEN Este artículo se centra en las concepciones, actitudes y prácticas de los pobladores de cuatro veredas en Tierralta y Valencia (Córdoba, Colombia), que han padecido o conocen la leishmaniasis cutánea. Se implementó una metodología mixta que combinó un diseño cualitativo con entrevistas y grupos focales (n=45), y un diseño epidemiológico en el que se aplicó la prueba de Montenegro (n=251), se relevaron casos sospechosos de leishmaniasis cutánea en humanos (n=5) y se realizaron encuestas epidemiológicas (n=409). Entre los resultados se encontró que hay un desconocimiento del vector y, aunque identificaron la Lutzomyia (Alú), no la correlacionaron con la leishmaniasis cutánea. Por otra parte, los tratamientos tradicionales caseros son los más usados, lo que provoca el aumento del subregistro de casos. Respecto al personal de salud, se encontraron fallas en el diagnóstico y el tratamiento, lo que refuerza la adherencia a tratamientos caseros. Este escenario nos insta a reflexionar acerca de los retos del sistema de salud respecto a las intervenciones del personal de salud en las comunidades asentadas en zonas endémicas.
ABSTRACT This article focuses on the conceptions, attitudes and practices of the inhabitants from four villages (veredas) in Tierralta and Valencia (Cordoba, Colombia), who have suffered from or are aware of the existence of cutaneous leishmaniasis. A mixed methodology was implemented based in a qualitative design using interviews and focus groups (n=45) and an epidemiological design which included applying the Montenegro test (n=251), uncovering suspected cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis in humans, (n=5) and applying epidemiological surveys (n=409). Among the results, a lack of knowledge regarding the vector was found; although respondents could identify the Lutzomyia (known as “alú”), they did not correlate it with cutaneous leishmaniasis. In addition, traditional home treatments were more frequently used, increasing the underrecording of cases. With respect to healthcare personnel, flaws in diagnosis and treatment were found, which reinforces adherence to home treatments. This scenario calls for a reflection upon the challenges of the health care system in relation to the interventions of health personnel in communities situated in endemic areas.