Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 270, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39235593

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Choosing the best stump closure method for laparoscopic appendectomy has been a debated issue, especially for patients with acute appendicitis. The lack of consensus in the literature and the diverse techniques available have prompted the need for a comprehensive evaluation to guide surgeons in selecting the most optimal appendiceal stump closure method. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on multiple databases from inception until December 2023 to find relevant studies according to eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the incidence of total complications. RESULTS: 25 studies with a total of 3308 patients were included in this study, overall complications did not reveal a significant advantage for any intervention (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.53; 1.01), Superficial and deep infection risks were similar across all methods, Operative time was significantly longer with endoloop and Intracorporeal sutures (MD = 7.07, 95% CI: 3.28; 10.85) (MD = 26.1, 95% CI: 20.9; 31.29). CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant differences in overall complications among closure methods. However, Intracorporeal sutures and endoloop techniques were associated with extended operative durations.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis , Laparoscopía , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura , Metaanálisis en Red , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Tempo Operativo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 18859, 2024 08 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39143077

RESUMEN

Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have potential applications in medical education such as helping students study for their licensing exams by discussing unclear questions with them. However, they require evaluation on these complex tasks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how well publicly accessible LLMs performed on simulated UK medical board exam questions. 423 board-style questions from 9 UK exams (MRCS, MRCP, etc.) were answered by seven LLMs (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bard, Perplexity, Claude, Bing, Claude Instant). There were 406 multiple-choice, 13 true/false, and 4 "choose N" questions covering topics in surgery, pediatrics, and other disciplines. The accuracy of the output was graded. Statistics were used to analyze differences among LLMs. Leaked questions were excluded from the primary analysis. ChatGPT 4.0 scored (78.2%), Bing (67.2%), Claude (64.4%), and Claude Instant (62.9%). Perplexity scored the lowest (56.1%). Scores differed significantly between LLMs overall (p < 0.001) and in pairwise comparisons. All LLMs scored higher on multiple-choice vs true/false or "choose N" questions. LLMs demonstrated limitations in answering certain questions, indicating refinements needed before primary reliance in medical education. However, their expanding capabilities suggest a potential to improve training if thoughtfully implemented. Further research should explore specialty specific LLMs and optimal integration into medical curricula.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Educacional , Humanos , Reino Unido , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Educación Médica/métodos , Inteligencia Artificial , Estudiantes de Medicina
4.
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev ; 22: 200296, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39026609

RESUMEN

Background & objectives: Rigid ring and Flexible band are techniques used to repair tricuspid valve regurgitation. The comparison between both techniques' effectiveness is controversial in the literature. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of rigid ring versus flexible band for tricuspid valve repair in patients with tricuspid valve regurgitation. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic search was performed in major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify relevant published studies. Data were extracted and analyzed using Stata (version 17 for Mac) and Revman (version 5.4 for Windows). Results: Twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. Total number of patients was 4259. The rigid ring wasn't superior to the flexible band in terms of postoperative tricuspid regurgitation RR 0.74, 95 % CI (0.43-1.27) (P = 0.29). However, the results were not homogeneous. After employing sensitivity analysis, the significance of the pooled effect estimate didn't change, showing no significant difference between the two annuloplasty RR 0.72, 95%CI (0.45-1.15). On the other hand, the rigid ring was associated with a higher bypass time than the flexible band (RR 4.85, P = 0.00). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, ICU stays, prolonged ventilation, mechanical ventilation time, annuloplasty size, stroke, concomitant mitral valve surgery, concomitant aortic valve surgery, atrial fibrillation, pacemaker implantation, low cardiac output, in-hospital death, or late death (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: Our study findings suggested no difference between rigid ring compared to flexible band regarding the rates of postoperative tricuspid regurgitation; however, rigid ring may encompass a higher bypass time. Therefore, further research is required to ensure our findings.

5.
Hellenic J Cardiol ; 2024 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38909846

RESUMEN

Aortic dissection (AD) is a catastrophic life-threatening cardiovascular emergency with a 1-2% per hour mortality rate post-diagnosis, characterized physiologically by the separation of aortic wall layers. AD initially presents as intense pain that can then radiate to the back, arms, neck, or jaw along with neurological deficits like difficulty in speaking, and unilateral weakness in some patients. This spectrum of clinical features associated with AD is often confused with acute myocardial infarction, hence leading to a delay in AD diagnosis. Cardiac and vascular biomarkers are structural proteins and microRNAs circulating in the bloodstream that correlate to tissue damage and their levels become detectable even before symptom onset. Timely diagnosis of AD using biomarkers, in combination with advanced imaging diagnostics, will significantly improve prognosis by allowing earlier vascular interventions. This comprehensive review aims to investigate emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of AD, as well as provide future directives for creating advanced diagnostic tools and imaging techniques.

6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11764, 2024 May 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783012

RESUMEN

In this work, we investigate the dynamics of a spacecraft near two primary bodies. The massive body is considered to have a spherical shape, while the less massive one is elongated and modeled as a dipole. The dipole consists of two connected masses, one is spherical and the other is an oblate spheroid. The gravitational potential of the elongated body is determined by four independent parameters. To study the dynamics, we construct the equations of motion of a spacecraft with negligible mass under the effect of the current force model. The existence and locations of the equilibrium points are analyzed for various values of the system parameters. We found that the existence and locations of the points are affected by the system parameters. Also, we studied the linear stability of the equilibrium points. We found some stable collinear points when the oblateness parameter is negative, otherwise the points are not stable. We used the curves of zero velocity to identify the regions of allowed motion. Furthermore, we discussed the 2001 SN263 asteroid system and found some stable collinear points when the oblateness parameter is negative. In addition, the triangular points of the system are stable in a linear sense.

7.
Diabet Med ; 41(1): e15196, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37567739

RESUMEN

AIMS: This meta-analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of fully closed-loop automated insulin delivery (AID) in patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systemically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception until April 26, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fully closed-loop AID versus conventional insulin therapy. The outcomes were pooled as the mean difference (MD) and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) in the random effect model. Our primary outcome was the proportion of time in the target glucose range (5.6-10 mmol/L, 3.9-10 mmol/L, or 3.9-8 mmol/L, depending on the study). Key secondary outcomes included the proportion of time spent in hyperglycaemia or hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: We included seven RCTs (three crossover and four parallel design), compromising 390 patients. Our analysis showed that compared to the control group, fully closed-loop AID increased the proportion of time spent within the target glucose range by additional 337 min per 24 h (MD = 23.39%, 95% CI [16.64%, 30.14%], p < 0.01), additional 108 min overnight (MD = 22.40%, 95% CI [12.88%, 31.91%], p < 0.01), and additional 258 min during the daytime period (MD = 26.85%, 95% CI [21.06%, 32.63%], p < 0.01). Compared to the control group, the overall time in hyperglycaemia was shortened by 326 min per 24 h (MD = -22.67%, 95% CI [-30.87%, -14.46%], p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of overall, overnight, and daytime periods spent in hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that fully closed-loop AID may improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly for those with more challenging diabetes management. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of implementing these systems in clinical practice. [Correction added on 26 August 2023 after first online publication: Under Results, the first sentence "We included seven RCTs (three crossover and one parallel designs)" has been changed to "We included seven RCTs (three crossover and four parallel designs)".].


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hiperglucemia , Hipoglucemia , Humanos , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Control Glucémico , Sistemas de Infusión de Insulina , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Hipoglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucemia , Glucosa , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Cruzados
8.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 79: 103973, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35721787

RESUMEN

Background: COVID-19, which is caused by the corona virus 2 that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome, causes a respiratory and systemic illness that in 10-15% of patients escalates to a severe form of pneumonia. Thrombocytopenia is frequent in patients with COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the association between thrombocytopenia and the severity of COVID-19 infection in hospitalized patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done on 800 Egyptian patients with confirmed covid-19 infection. They were divided into Group I (Mild): 200 symptomatic patients meeting the case definition for COVID-19 without radiological evidence of pneumonia or hypoxia. Group II (Moderate): 200 patients with clinical signs of non-severe pneumonia and radiological evidence of pneumonia. Group III (Severe): 200 patients with clinical signs of pneumonia plus: respiratory or lung dysfunction. Group IV: 200 critically ill patient in ICU: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Results: there was a highly statistically significant difference between the studied groups regarding thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001). Thrombocytopenia was statistically higher in severe and critically ill patients. In addition, a statistically significant difference found in outcome among the studied groups (p < 0.05) {critically ill (40%), severe (17.5%)}. The most common cause of death was respiratory failure, which occurred in 28 severe patients (80%) and 65 critically ill patients (81.25%), followed by hemorrhage due to thrombocytopenia, which occurred in 7 severe patients (20%) and 15 critically ill patients, respectively (18.75%). Conclusion: The Platelet count is a straightforward, inexpensive, as well as easily available laboratory parameter that is frequently linked to severe covid-19 infection and a significant death risk.

9.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 74: 103234, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35035951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The latest novel corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic shows a significant health concern. We aimed to study the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms among COVID-19 Egyptian patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 860 patients with COVID-19 infection classified according to Ministry of Health Program (MOHP) into three groups (280 patients with mild infection, 258 patients with moderate disease and 322 patients with severe disease). All patients were subjected to medical history, clinical examination, laboratory investigations, high-resolution computed tomography chest (HRCT chest) and other investigations when needed in some patients e.g., upper gastro-intestinal (GI) endoscopy, abdomino-pelvic ultrasound and ECHO. RESULTS: Gastro-intestinal symptoms were present in 27.2% of the studied patients. The most common reported GIT symptoms were vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal/gastric pain, followed by nausea. GIT symptoms presence was significantly higher in severe cases in comparison to mild or moderate cases. C-reactive protein (CRP), serum ferritin, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, and creatinine were significantly associated with the presence of GI symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: GI symptoms are prevalent among COVID-19 patients, the most common were vomiting and diarrhea and were associated with COVID-19 severity.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA