RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several medications, including antihistamines, can alter salivary gland function, causing dry mouth or xerostomia. Antihistamines are commonly used for treating allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare and correlate the effects of first-generation vs. second-generation H1-antihistamines on the parotid glands of rats. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve adult male albino rats were used; 4 rats served as a control group (group I) and the remaining rats were divided into 2 groups: group II received promethazine hydrochloride; and group III received cetirizine dihydrochloride for 3 weeks. The parotid salivary glands were dissected, and examined histologically and analyzed histomorphometrically for the acinar area percentage. In addition, mRNA gene expression of iNOS, caspase-3 and α-SMA was assessed using quantitative realtime polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Finally, all the obtained data was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Histologically, group I showed the typical architecture of the gland. In group II, degenerative changes were noticed, including acinar degeneration and shrinkage with widened connective tissue septa, intracellular vacuolization, and increased inflammatory cell infiltration. In group III, similar histological features were detected as in group II, but to a lesser extent. Histomorphometric results revealed significant differences in the acinar area percentage between various groups. In addition, qRT-PCR results showed a significant increase in iNOS expression in both groups II and III as compared to group I, caspase-3 gene expression was significantly increased in group II, while in group III, it increased non-significantly. Finally, α-SMA gene expression non-significantly decreased in both groups II and III. A significant positive correlation was observed between caspase-3 and iNOS gene expression, while an inverse correlation was noticed between caspase-3 and α-SMA gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of antihistamines resulted in changes in the rat salivary glands, which could be due to the induction of oxidative stress and the resultant apoptotic effect. These changes were suggested to occur mainly through action on muscarinic receptors; yet, action on histamine receptors could not be excluded. However; these effects were less marked with the second-generation antihistamine.

Asunto(s)

Actinas , Caspasa 3 , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II , Glándula Parótida , Animales , Ratas , Masculino , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II/genética , Glándula Parótida/efectos de los fármacos , Glándula Parótida/metabolismo , Caspasa 3/metabolismo , Actinas/metabolismo , Actinas/genética , Cetirizina/farmacología , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1/farmacología

RESUMEN

The current review aims to systematically assess the osteogenic capacity of gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) in preclinical studies. A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, as well as a manual search of relevant references, was performed in June 2020 without date or language restrictions. Eligibility criteria were the following: studies that compared mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from the gingiva with other MSC sources (in vitro or in vivo) or cell-free scaffold (in vivo) and studies that reported at least one of the following outcomes: osteogenic potential and new bone formation for in vitro and in vivo, respectively. Moreover, the assessment of included studies was conducted using appropriate guidelines. From 646 initial retrieved studies, 35 full-text articles were subjected to further screening and 26 studies were selected (20 in vitro studies and 6 in vivo studies). GMSCs showed great proliferation capacity and expressed recognized mesenchymal stem cell markers, particularly CD90. In vitro, MSC sources including GMSCs were capable of undergoing osteogenic differentiation with less ability in GMSCs, while most in vivo studies confirmed the capacity of GMSCs to regenerate bony defects. Concerning the assessment of methodological quality, in vitro studies met the relevant guideline except in five areas: the sample size calculation, randomization, allocation concealment, implementation, and blinding, and in vivo publications had probably low risk of bias in most domains except in three areas: allocation concealment, attrition, and blinding items.

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can regenerate missing tissues and treat diseases. Hence, the current work aimed to compare the proliferation rate and the osteogenic differentiation potential of bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs), gingival MSCs (GMSCs) and submandibular MSCs (SMSCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: MSCs derived from bone marrow, gingiva and submandibular salivary gland were isolated and cultured from rats. The proliferation capacity was judged by MTT proliferation Assay. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by Alzarin red stain and quantitative RT-PCR was performed for Runx-2 and MMP-13. RESULTS: The highest significant proliferation was estimated in the BMSCs compared to GMSCs and SMSCs (p-value was < 0.01). All studied cell types formed mineralized nodules as stained with Alizarin Red stain at the 3rd passage of differentiation. However, BMSCs seemed to generate the highest level of mineralization compared to GMSCs and SMSCs. RT-PCR revealed that the expression of Runx-2 and MMP-13 mRNAs was significantly increased in the BMSCs compared to GMSCs and SMSCs (p-value was < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: BMSCs displayed maximum osteogenesis results followed by the GMSCs and lastly by the SGSCs. Thus, it could be recommended that GMSCs can be used as a second choice after BMSCs when bone tissue reconstruction is needed. Key words:Mesenchymal stem cells, osteogenic differentiation, Runx-2, MMP-13.