RESUMEN
Background: Racially minoritized women with limited socioeconomic resources are at increased risk for adverse psychological outcomes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Disproportionate rates of trauma exposure and economic insecurity likely heighten risk for these outcomes among socioeconomically vulnerable individuals, but the unique contributions of these factors are poorly understood. As such, we examined trauma and economic factors as predictors of pandemic-related psychological distress and symptoms. Methods: Ninety-six women recruited for a trauma research study (91.7% Black, Mage=38.3 years, SDage=11.8 years) completed measures of trauma exposure, economic insecurity, and several items assessing psychological distress and symptoms related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined concern for mental and physical health impacts of COVID-19 as well as changes in self-reported levels of anxiety and anhedonia from the three months prior to the pandemic to the past two weeks. Linear regression analyses were used to assess contributions of trauma exposure and economic insecurity to COVID-19-related distress. Results: Childhood maltreatment and lifetime trauma exposure did not predict COVID-19-related distress; however, financial concern significantly contributed to concern for the physical health impact of COVID-19 (B = .30, p < .05). Food insecurity emerged as the only significant predictor of concern for mental health impact of COVID-19 (B=.91, p < .01). Housing instability was the only significant predictor of COVID-19-related increases in anhedonia (B = -.30, p < .05). Conclusions: Economic insecurity, namely self-reported financial concern, food insecurity, and housing instability, was related to COVID-19-related psychological distress in a sample of predominately Black American women living in under-resourced communities. Findings may help identify populations at risk for COVID-19-related psychological distress and symptoms and develop effective interventions, such as expanding access to nutritious food sources and housing support, for minoritized community members.
RESUMEN
Objetive: The objective of this clinical trial was to investigate the perception of pain during initial maxillary alignment with an adjunctive procedure of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) compared to conventional orthodontics. Material and methods: This study design was a single-centre, two-arm parallel prospective randomised clinical trial. Thirty consecutive adult subjects (25 females and 5 males; mean age ± SD, 22.66 ± 3.27 years) with 5-8mm moderate upper labial segment crowding were randomly allocated using block randomisation into intervention and control group. All subjects had first premolar extractions, bonded conventional fixed appliances and 0.014-inch nickel-titanium archwire was placed for initial alignment. The intervention group received a 3-mm deep MOPs procedure under local anaesthesia using a Propel device (PROPEL Ortho Singapore) on the labiogingival aspect between the maxillary incisors. Both groups received a set of 100 mm visual analogue scale to complete over the first week, recording pain at 24 hours, 3 days and 1 week. Data were analysed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: There was a statistically significant difference observed in perceived pain levels between MOPs and the control group on day 1, day 3 and day 7 postoperatively. Pain perception was significantly lower in the intervention group at all time points. Conclusion: Accelerating orthodontic tooth movement with MOPs did not accentuate pain perceived during initial maxillary alignment with fixed appliances.
Objetivo: El objetivo de este ensayo clínico fue investigar la percepción del dolor durante la alineación maxilar inicial con un procedimiento adyuvante de micro-osteoperforaciones (MOP) en comparación con la ortodoncia convencional. Material y Métodos: El diseño de este estudio fue un ensayo clínico aleatorizado prospectivo paralelo de dos brazos y un solo centro. Treinta sujetos adultos consecutivos (25 mujeres y 5 hombres; edad media ± DE, 22,66 ± 3,27 años) con apiñamiento moderado del segmento labial superior de 5-8 mm se asignaron al azar mediante la asignación al azar en bloques en el grupo de intervención y de control. A todos los sujetos se les realizaron extracciones de los primeros premolares, se colocaron aparatos fijos convencionales adheridos y se colocó un arco de níquel-titanio de 0,014 pulgadas para la alineación inicial. El grupo de intervención recibió un procedimiento de MOP de 3 mm de profundidad bajo anestesia local utilizando un dispositivo Propel (PROPEL Ortho Singapore) en la cara labial de los incisivos superiores. Ambos grupos recibieron un conjunto de escala analógica visual de 100 mm para completar durante la primera semana, registrando el dolor a las 24 horas, 3 días y 1 semana. Los datos se analizaron mediante análisis de varianza de medidas repetidas (ANOVA). Resultados: Se observó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en los niveles de dolor percibido entre los MOP y el grupo de control el día 1, el día 3 y el día 7 del postoperatorio. La percepción del dolor fue significativamente menor en el grupo de intervención en todos los momentos. Conclusión: La aceleración del movimiento dental de ortodoncia con MOP no acentuó el dolor percibido durante la alineación maxilar inicial con aparatos fijos.