Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 28(8): 1681-1686, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34342555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a life-threatening complication of Docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimens (DBRs). Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) can reduce the risk of FN. This study investigated the effect of G-CSF on FN in patients receiving DBRs for breast cancer. METHODS: Patients treated between 2015 and 2017 were identified from the hospital's pharmacy database and their medical records were examined retrospectively. Data from patients' first four cycles of DBR were collected. FN rate, FN associated length of hospital stay (FN-LOS), and chemotherapy dose modification/delay due to FN were compared between patients who did (G-CSF group) or did not (non-GCSF group) receive prophylactic G-CSF. RESULTS: Of the 276 included patients, 83.3% received a DBR as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy, and 50% received docetaxel as combination therapy. Prophylactic G-CSF was administered with the first cycle of a DBR in 69.9% of patients who were significantly less likely to experience FN compared to the non-G-CSF group (6.2% vs. 15.7%; odds ratio: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.16-0.82]; p = 0.020). Collectively and after the 4 DBR treatment cycles, FN rate (4.8 vs. 8.5; odds ratio: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.30-0.97]; p = 0.043) and the mean FN-LOS (3.55 vs. 5.28 days; t = -2.22; p = 0.037) were reduced in the G-CSF group. There was no difference in DBR dose delay/reduction between both groups in cycles 2-4. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving DBRs for breast cancer, prophylactic G-CSF significantly reduced both the rate of FN and duration of hospitalization for FN.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neutropenia Febril , Humanos , Femenino , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia Febril/prevención & control , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Granulocitos
3.
Tumori ; 104(6): 471-475, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28009428

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is used to treat patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma. In this retrospective study we report our experience with patients who underwent HDCT and ASCT. METHODS: All patients ≥15 years old with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma who underwent HDCT and ASCT between June 2001 and December 2013 were included. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were identified. Median age at transplant was 22 years (range 15-49 years); 26 were men and 28 were women. Forty-eight patients (89%) underwent HDCT and ASCT after achieving a radiological response to salvage chemotherapy. The rate of radiological complete response to salvage chemotherapy was 13% and reached 50% within 3 months of ASCT in assessable patients. After a median follow-up of 25 months, 31 patients (57%) were still alive with no evidence of relapse or progression. Median event-free survival (EFS) was 24 months (95% CI 8.7-39.3) and 3-year EFS was 56%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached and 3-year OS was 82.5%. Bulky mediastinal disease at relapse, hemoglobin level, and number of salvage regimens did not significantly impact EFS in univariate and multivariate analyses. After transplantation there was a trend towards longer EFS (30 vs. 24 months; p = 0.36) in patients with a longer time from the end of first-line treatment until relapse (≥12 vs. <12 months). The 100-day transplant-related mortality was 5.5%. CONCLUSIONS: HDCT and ASCT for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma is safe. Our findings are consistent with published phase III results. Longer follow-up is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Adulto Joven
4.
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol ; 36(1): 55-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25810576

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A substantial number of cancer patients receive chemotherapy until the end of life (EoL). Various factors have been shown to be associated with receipt of chemotherapy until near death. In this study, we determine our average time from last chemotherapy to death (TLCD) and explore different factors that may be associated with decreased TLCD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of adult cancer patients who received chemotherapy during their illness and died in our hospital between January 2010 and January 2012 was conducted. Chi-square test and t-test were used to examine the correlation between selected factors and use of chemotherapy within 60 days of death. Multivariate analysis was used to test independent significance of factors testing positive in univariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform survival analysis. RESULTS: Of the 115 cancer patients who died in the hospital, 41 (35.6%) had TLCD of 60 days or less. Patients with better performance status and those dying under medical oncology service were more likely to be in this group of patients. Univariate analysis showed that these patients were less likely to have palliative care involvement, were more likely to die of treatment related causes, and more likely to have died in the Intensive Care Unit. Multivariate analysis confirmed lack of palliative care involvement and better performance status as independent factors for TLCD less than 60 days. Survival analyses showed that patients with palliative care involvement and those dying under palliative care service were likely to have significantly longer TLCD. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients who have no involvement of palliative care team in their management tend to receive chemotherapy near the EoL, have more aggressive EoL care, and have higher risk of dying die from treatment related complications. Palliative care should be involved early in the care of cancer patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA