RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Icelandic health care system ranks favourably in international comparison but patients' experience of interaction with the health service has not been well studied. The goal of this study was to examine the satisfaction of patients admitted to the Acute Cardiac Unit (ACU) at Landspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland. METHODS: A questionnaire based on the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III was mailed to patients admitted to the ACU between 1 January and 29 February 2012. Questions were presented as statements and participants asked to respond how strongly on a scale from 1 to 5 they agreed or disagreed with each statement. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, Cronbach´s alpha for internal consistency of scales and principal components analysis, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests for comparison of groups and Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients for correlation between variables. RESULTS: The questionnaire was mailed to 485 individuals of whom 275 (57%) responded. The median age of the participants was 62 (range, 19-95) years and 132 (48%) were women. Internal consistency of the scales was mostly high (Cronbach's alpha 0.62-0.91) and principal components analysis revealed one main factor. The mean score of the questionnaire was 6.8 ±1.0 and 91%, and 86% of the participants were pleased with their interaction with physicians and nurses, respectively. Similarly, 88% were pleased with the care they recieved but 25% felt they received insufficient explanations of their symptoms or that follow-up care was lacking. CONCLUSION: Patients of the ACU generally appear to be satisfied with their care. However, our results suggest that improvement is needed in several areas, including information provided at discharge and follow-up care.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Cardiológicas , Hospitales Universitarios , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Instituciones Cardiológicas/normas , Competencia Clínica , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Islandia , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos Humanos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: This paper is a report of a study conducted in 2004 on the determinants of attitudes towards hormone replacement therapy in the aftermath of the report on the findings of the Women's Health Initiative study. BACKGROUND: The unexpected findings of the Women's Health Initiative study, published in July 2002, showed that the risk of using combined hormones exceeded their benefits. This complicated women's decision-making about hormone use and made it important to study the determinants of their attitudes to hormone therapy, as these are likely to influence their behaviour. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was conducted with a sample of 561 women drawn from the National Registry of Iceland. A self-administered questionnaire, measuring attitudes towards hormone replacement therapy, attitudes towards menopause, extent and source of menopausal education, symptom experience, health and lifestyle and knowledge about the findings of the Women's Health Initiative, was used. The overall response rate was 56%. Attitudes to hormone replacement therapy were compared using anova, t-tests and correlations. RESULTS: Participants generally had positive attitudes. Knowledge about the Women's Health Initiative study was not associated with more negative attitudes. However, receiving the information from and discussing it with a doctor were associated with more positive attitudes. Positive attitudes towards hormone therapy were also associated with higher age, time since last menstrual period and current use of hormone replacement therapy. Negative attitudes were associated with use of natural remedies and receiving information from or discussing hormone therapy with family or friends. CONCLUSION: Research is needed to identify the dynamics of the medical interview, and the nature of input from friends, spouse and other family members. The content of these messages may be different and conflicting, for example, between doctors and family members. The nature of this conflict and conflicts of interests need to be identified in order to inform women's decision-making. In addition, action needs to be taken in order to strengthen the advisory role of nurses.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Menopausia , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Islandia , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
The study of school bullying has recently assumed an international dimension, but is faced with difficulties in finding terms in different languages to correspond to the English word bullying. To investigate the meanings given to various terms, a set of 25 stick-figure cartoons was devised, covering a range of social situations between peers. These cartoons were shown to samples of 8- and 14-year-old pupils (N = 1,245; n = 604 at 8 years, n = 641 at 14 years) in schools in 14 different countries, who judged whether various native terms cognate to bullying, applied to them. Terms from 10 Indo-European languages and three Asian languages were sampled. Multidimensional scaling showed that 8-year-olds primarily discriminated nonaggressive and aggressive cartoon situations; however, 14-year-olds discriminated fighting from physical bullying, and also discriminated verbal bullying and social exclusion. Gender differences were less appreciable than age differences. Based on the 14-year-old data, profiles of 67 words were then constructed across the five major cartoon clusters. The main types of terms used fell into six groups: bullying (of all kinds), verbal plus physical bullying, solely verbal bullying, social exclusion, solely physical aggression, and mainly physical aggression. The findings are discussed in relation to developmental trends in how children understand bullying, the inferences that can be made from cross-national studies, and the design of such studies.